IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v87y2026ics0160791x26001338.html

Industrial smart shoes design decisions in Metaverse for hazardous industries through the fuzzy DIBR-SWEM methodology

Author

Listed:
  • Ecer, Fatih
  • Pamucar, Dragan
  • Yaran Ögel, İlkin
  • Simic, Vladimir

Abstract

As an extension of workplace wearable technologies, industrial smart shoes (ISS) have recently grasped the attention of professionals working in hazardous industries like the construction industry to ensure workplace safety, health, and productivity. However, the tasks of construction industry professionals are challenging in evaluating and selecting the best ISS to enhance construction workers' safety, due to methodological weaknesses in the current studies, the complexity of the decision-making process, the technologically complex nature of these devices, and the non-availability of real ISS in the marketplace. Considering all these gaps, this research attempts to design a new ISS by determining critical design criteria and selecting the best ISS prototype for construction workers using Metaverse technologies, which allow companies to conduct concept testing for products that cannot be safely and cost-efficiently tested in real-world settings. In this research, five main criteria and 18 sub-criteria are identified under the aspects of health, safety, technical, ergonomics, and economics. Then, five ISS alternatives are created for concept testing in the Metaverse. To do this, the research proposes a novel methodology named Defining Interrelationships Between Ranked criteria (DIBR) and Schweiyer-Sklar weighted evaluation model (SWEM) with fuzzy information, i.e., DIBR-SWEM-F. Whereas DIBR-F is employed to obtain criteria weights, SWEM-F is applied to find the final alternative ranking. The findings reveal that safety is the foremost criterion, whereas price, maintenance cost, and sending emergency SOS messages are the first top sub-criteria to be evaluated in the ISS development process. Based on the overall evaluation, the A5 prototype is selected as the best option for construction workers. To prove the methodology's robustness, a sensitivity control is conducted. This research contributes to the wearable technology literature by integrating the design of smart shoes to be used in hazardous industries with Metaverse technology for concept testing and the proposed methodology by deploying a novel fuzzy MCGDM approach. Further, by presenting essential design criteria of ISS, the results contribute to industrial designers and wearable technology companies responsible for the design and development of new ISS for the construction industry. Moreover, the results help industry professionals, such as decision-makers in the industrial buying process and construction workers, in evaluating and selecting the optimum ISS.

Suggested Citation

  • Ecer, Fatih & Pamucar, Dragan & Yaran Ögel, İlkin & Simic, Vladimir, 2026. "Industrial smart shoes design decisions in Metaverse for hazardous industries through the fuzzy DIBR-SWEM methodology," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:87:y:2026:i:c:s0160791x26001338
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2026.103344
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X26001338
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2026.103344?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:87:y:2026:i:c:s0160791x26001338. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.