IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v87y2026ics0160791x26001314.html

Why machine learning is a misnomer

Author

Listed:
  • Margaryan, Anoush

Abstract

This paper problematises the notion of machine learning (ML) and challenges its applicability to contemporary algorithms. Drawing on theoretical insights from learning sciences, praxeological, and social-cognitive perspectives of learning and agency, the paper critically analyses the so-called agentic and learning features attributed to current ML algorithms comparing these against genuine, human agentic learning capabilities. Furthermore, the paper explores the implications of co-opting uniquely human nomenclature to describe mechanistic phenomena. The main contribution of this paper consists in exposing fundamental misalignments between genuine agentic learning processes and the operations of current machine algorithms misnomered as learning. The paper offers a more nuanced understanding of the nature of ML/AI, urging a reassessment of the dominant narratives surrounding these technologies. It will be of interest to interdisciplinary scholars of ML/AI, policymakers, educators, as well as computer scientists and technology developers interested in critical social sciences perspectives on algorithmic systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Margaryan, Anoush, 2026. "Why machine learning is a misnomer," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:87:y:2026:i:c:s0160791x26001314
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2026.103342
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X26001314
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2026.103342?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:87:y:2026:i:c:s0160791x26001314. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.