IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v86y2026ics0160791x26000783.html

The missing link for AI at work: Towards an organization-centered approach to large language models’ explainability

Author

Listed:
  • Audrin, Bertrand
  • Audrin, Catherine

Abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) present both opportunities and challenges for organizations. While these models promise efficiency gains, there are concerns regarding their lack of explainability. Current research on AI explainability primarily adopts a technical perspective that is often misaligned with the expectations and expertise of organizational decision-makers. This work explores a novel approach to AI explainability through an organizational lens, leveraging insights from Human Resource Management and Organizational Behavior. Using personality tests as an example of selection instrument and a source of information about behavioral patterns, we assess several LLMs under two conditions (fixed or randomized order), two versions of the same instrument (original or rephrased items), and two different prompts (emphasizing honesty or not). We also assess LLMs in work behaviors and task performance. Results suggest that LLMs present distinct profiles of traits and behaviors and that their answers are affected by the assessment context. These results provide a new type of post-hoc model-agnostic explanations by simplification that aligns with organizational actors' expectations and as such can help develop an organization-centered approach to LLMs' explainability. This calls for more research on how to adapt and adopt selection and integration instruments to approach LLMs’ explainability more robustly from an organizational perspective.

Suggested Citation

  • Audrin, Bertrand & Audrin, Catherine, 2026. "The missing link for AI at work: Towards an organization-centered approach to large language models’ explainability," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:86:y:2026:i:c:s0160791x26000783
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2026.103289
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X26000783
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2026.103289?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:86:y:2026:i:c:s0160791x26000783. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.