IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v86y2026ics0160791x26000692.html

Examining the digital divide in online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from undergraduates at 28 research universities

Author

Listed:
  • Ma, Liping
  • Cui, Haili
  • Zhou, Xuehan

Abstract

Using a survey of 11,501 undergraduates from 28 research universities in China, this study examined disparities in the effectiveness of online learning across undergraduates with diverse family backgrounds. Our results indicate that disadvantaged students (rural hukou status, first-generation college students, and students whose mothers held underprivileged occupations) were more likely to perceive online education as ineffective. Potential reasons for the digital divide were explored. The findings indicate that disadvantaged students encounter significantly greater challenges in their online learning experience. Among these obstacles, family-related challenges (such as the absence of essential tools and resources for online learning and distractions within their learning environment) had a more significant impact on disadvantaged students than individual-related issues (reduced learning motivation, limited familiarity with educational tools, and diminished engagement in the learning process), or school-related issues (such as course scheduling, teacher-student interactions, student-student interactions, and learning support). This study is one of the pioneering efforts to shed light on the digital divide issues and comprehensively understand the underlying factors at play in research universities.

Suggested Citation

  • Ma, Liping & Cui, Haili & Zhou, Xuehan, 2026. "Examining the digital divide in online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from undergraduates at 28 research universities," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:86:y:2026:i:c:s0160791x26000692
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2026.103280
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X26000692
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2026.103280?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:86:y:2026:i:c:s0160791x26000692. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.