Author
Listed:
- Hormiga, Esther
- Jonckers, Geraldine
- Urbano, David
Abstract
Generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools are transforming visual production across multiple domains, including entrepreneurship. However, their influence on constructing cultural imaginaries and legitimating symbols remains insufficiently examined. This study analyzes how text-to-image systems visually represent entrepreneurship and success, using a focused sample of 24 images generated with the Midjourney platform. Through critical visual discourse analysis, the research identifies recurring aesthetic codes, symbolic patterns, and temporal framings that demonstrate how generative AI replicates established cultural narratives of entrepreneurship. The results indicate a consistent depiction of solitary, self-assured individuals who embody control, ambition, and transcendence. In contrast, representations of collaboration, diversity, and social contribution are largely absent. The visual grammar emphasizes formality, isolation, and monumental composition, while temporal orientations favor immediacy and permanence rather than process and collective effort. These algorithmic representations reinforce narrow ideals of entrepreneurial legitimacy and perpetuate masculine-coded notions of success and authority. To synthesize these findings, the study introduces a conceptual model of the sociotemporal automation of legitimacy in generative AI entrepreneurial imaginaries. This model connects algorithmic infrastructures, aesthetic and temporal representations, and cultural circulation through the feedback loop of human-AI co-production. The paper contributes to understanding the aesthetic mechanisms by which generative AI consolidates dominant entrepreneurial ideals and considers implications for critical visual literacy, responsible AI deployment, and inclusive innovation policy.
Suggested Citation
Hormiga, Esther & Jonckers, Geraldine & Urbano, David, 2026.
"Legitimating entrepreneurship through generative AI: The reproduction of visual stereotypes,"
Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:teinso:v:86:y:2026:i:c:s0160791x26000679
DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2026.103278
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:86:y:2026:i:c:s0160791x26000679. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.