IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v86y2026ics0160791x26000515.html

Shining light on solar acceptance: Spatial context and question-order effects on public responses to solar placement options

Author

Listed:
  • Zuch, Matteo
  • Espina Carreño, Sergio
  • Ladenburg, Jacob

Abstract

This study examines how spatial context and external framing shape public acceptance of solar photovoltaic (PV) across three placement options: residential rooftops, industrial buildings, and agricultural land. Using Denmark as a case study, it is among the first to provide cross-cutting evidence on within-technology spatial spillover dynamics and external question-order effects in solar PV acceptance. The analysis is based on a large-scale online survey (n = 3873) among the Danish population, including experimental design elements. Survey data are combined with individual-level geospatial measures, capturing exposure/proximity to existing PV infrastructure. Acceptance responses are analyzed in case-specific regression models to identify key determinants of public PV acceptance. The results reveal a clear acceptance ranking: PV on industrial buildings is most accepted, followed by residential rooftops and land-based installations. Individual exposure/proximity to existing solar farms significantly increases acceptance of industrial-rooftop PV, indicating positive within-technology spatial spillover effects. In contrast, higher local PV coverage reduces acceptance, particularly among non-owners, suggesting local saturation effects. Acceptance is also sensitive to framing, as the sequence of presented PV options systematically affects acceptance and conditions spatial effects. Overall, the findings emphasize that solar acceptance is highly context-dependent, shaped by individual experience, local characteristics, and external framing. By integrating detailed spatial measures, experimental elements, and placement-specific within-solar variations, this study advances existing energy acceptance research and offers actionable guidance for policymakers and energy planners. Implementing place-sensitive siting, tailored engagement mechanisms, and targeted communication processes can strengthen public support and facilitate the successful deployment of socially just solar energy pathways.

Suggested Citation

  • Zuch, Matteo & Espina Carreño, Sergio & Ladenburg, Jacob, 2026. "Shining light on solar acceptance: Spatial context and question-order effects on public responses to solar placement options," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:86:y:2026:i:c:s0160791x26000515
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2026.103262
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X26000515
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2026.103262?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:86:y:2026:i:c:s0160791x26000515. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.