IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v86y2026ics0160791x26000485.html

Idea readability and complexity in online user innovation communities: Effects on implementation and advocacy

Author

Listed:
  • Yang, Mu
  • Amankwah-Amoah, Joseph
  • Han, Chunjia

Abstract

Despite the importance of online user innovation communities (OUICs) as venues for capturing novel ideas for innovation and new product development, little research has examined how idea characteristics, such as readability and complexity, interplay with firms’ implementation decisions and the advocacy of other community members. Drawing on stakeholder engagement theory and leveraging data from 11,985 ideas collected and 657 ideas implemented, this study investigates how user idea-contribution behaviors in OUICs influence performance. The findings indicate that idea complexity is negatively associated with both implementation and advocacy, whereas idea length is negatively associated only with implementation. Additional moderating analyses show that discussion of ideas can mitigate the negative effect of textual complexity. Taken together, these results underscore the importance of idea readability and offer direct implications for firms that manage and promote OUICs.

Suggested Citation

  • Yang, Mu & Amankwah-Amoah, Joseph & Han, Chunjia, 2026. "Idea readability and complexity in online user innovation communities: Effects on implementation and advocacy," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:86:y:2026:i:c:s0160791x26000485
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2026.103259
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X26000485
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2026.103259?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:86:y:2026:i:c:s0160791x26000485. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.