Author
Listed:
- Ma, Jingmei
- Wu, Jie
- Li, Zhiqing
- Deng, Kaixin
Abstract
Government digital incentives contribute to improving the enterprise financial environment, enhancing enterprise receptivity to new technologies, and influencing enterprise artificial intelligence (AI) capability. This paper investigates whether and how government digital incentives enhance enterprise AI capability using empirical evidence from Chinese A-share listed enterprises during 2012-2023. By constructing comprehensive indicators to measure enterprise AI capability, we explore the impact of subsidy-based (SDI) and policy-based digital incentive (PDI) on enterprise AI capability and their underlying mechanisms. The findings reveal that: (1) Both SDI and PDI enhance enterprise AI capability, with results remaining robust after robustness tests. (2) SDI positively influence enterprise AI capability by alleviating financing constraints, while PDI exert positive effects through optimizing resource allocation efficiency. (3) Executive IT background positively moderates the relationship between both types of digital incentives and enterprise AI capability. (4) Heterogeneity analysis demonstrates that SDI have significantly stronger effects on enterprise AI capability in eastern regions compared to western and central regions, whereas PDI show more pronounced positive effects in central regions compared to eastern and western regions. Compared to non_SOEs, SDI have more significant positive effects on AI capability in SOEs, while PDI demonstrate stronger positive effects on AI capabilities in non_SOEs.
Suggested Citation
Ma, Jingmei & Wu, Jie & Li, Zhiqing & Deng, Kaixin, 2026.
"Can government digital incentives enhance enterprise artificial intelligence capability? - Evidence from China,"
Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:teinso:v:86:y:2026:i:c:s0160791x26000473
DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2026.103258
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:86:y:2026:i:c:s0160791x26000473. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.