Author
Listed:
- Liu, Lina
- Wei, Muhua
- Qi, Jiayin
- Liu, Huili
Abstract
With the successful commercialization of 5G mobile communication systems and the completion of 5G international standards, countries and regions with strong competitiveness in the field of mobile communication have begun to pay attention to the development of 6G technology standards, and have successively conducted research in the 6G field, proposing 6G related policies that are in line with their own development. At present, 6G has made certain progress and breakthroughs in vision goals, application scenarios, basic indicators, and potential key technologies. However, there are still uncertainties and risks in the development of 6G. Unlike existing research on 6G security or challenges, which mostly focuses on specific perspectives such as communication theory, standard setting, key technologies, application services, and privacy protection, and adopts qualitative methods for comprehensive research, this study is based on the risk management process of the Risk Management Guidelines released by the International Organization for Standardization in 2018. It uses the Delphi method to sort and judge the five types of uncertainties/risks and their 24 sub factors in the development of 6G, and then uses the Risk Matrix method based on Borda Count method to calculate the probability and impact of various uncertainties and risks, and ranks their importance. Finally, this study provides hedging strategies for different uncertainties and risks, thereby providing decision support for risk control in the development of 6G.
Suggested Citation
Liu, Lina & Wei, Muhua & Qi, Jiayin & Liu, Huili, 2026.
"How to evaluate the uncertainties and risks of 6G development? An exploration based on the risk matrix method,"
Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:teinso:v:86:y:2026:i:c:s0160791x26000424
DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2026.103253
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:86:y:2026:i:c:s0160791x26000424. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.