IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v86y2026ics0160791x26000412.html

User perceptions of credibility signals: A conjoint analysis of technological features in news platform

Author

Listed:
  • Nam, Jungwoo
  • Park, Nahyun
  • Lee, Haeyoon
  • Shin, Jungwoo
  • Lee, Daeho
  • Shin, Jieun

Abstract

In the era of information overload, the absence of centralized gatekeeping makes it increasingly difficult for users to evaluate the credibility of online news. Drawing on signaling theory, this study examines how technological characteristics embedded in platform interfaces serve as credibility signals that shape user preferences and willingness to pay. We focus on three attributes of online news platforms—interactivity, hypertextuality, and multimediality—and investigate their influence through a conjoint survey and mixed logit analysis. Our findings indicate that users consistently prefer credibility signals. Specifically, content modality, which represents multimediality, is the most influential factor in shaping user preferences, whereas human review verification is valued most highly in monetary terms. These results suggest that costly technological features operate as signals of online news quality, guiding credibility assessments and subscription decisions. The study extends signaling theory by applying it to online news platforms and linking it with research on information systems and human–computer interaction. In practice, the results provide guidance for platform managers and designers, emphasizing that verification and multimedia features can strengthen user preferences, enhance perceptions of credibility, and support revenue models. Thus, the study bridges theoretical insight with managerial relevance for the future development of online news platforms.

Suggested Citation

  • Nam, Jungwoo & Park, Nahyun & Lee, Haeyoon & Shin, Jungwoo & Lee, Daeho & Shin, Jieun, 2026. "User perceptions of credibility signals: A conjoint analysis of technological features in news platform," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:86:y:2026:i:c:s0160791x26000412
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2026.103252
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X26000412
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2026.103252?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:86:y:2026:i:c:s0160791x26000412. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.