IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v85y2026ics0160791x26000266.html

Development and validation of a scale to assess algorithmic literacy in the context of recommender systems (ALRS)

Author

Listed:
  • Sotero, José Manuel
  • Vicente, Paulo Nuno
  • Granado, António

Abstract

Algorithmic systems, particularly recommender systems, are central to online platforms yet remain largely opaque to users. Algorithmic literacy has therefore emerged as a critical competence to foster informed and autonomous engagement, especially among younger audiences. This study developed and validated a multidimensional scale—Algorithmic Literacy in the Context of Recommender Systems (ALRS)— focused on online audiovisual entertainment platforms. An initial pool of 51 items, derived from the literature, was refined through expert content validation, cognitive interviews, and lexical review, resulting in 38 items. The instrument was tested with 1564 Portuguese students aged 15–25. Reliability analyses showed strong internal consistency (α = 0.955; ω = 0.955; Spearman-Brown = 0.881). Exploratory factor analysis identified five dimensions, and confirmatory factor analysis on an independent sample supported a second-order structure with excellent fit indices (χ2/df = 1.55; CFI = 0.991; RMSEA = 0.040). Composite reliability and average variance extracted were also satisfactory. The final 29-item ALRS scale demonstrates robust psychometric properties across five dimensions—awareness, knowledge, assessment, reflection, and practical use—offering a valid and reliable instrument to assess algorithmic literacy in the context of recommender systems, with applications in education, research, and policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Sotero, José Manuel & Vicente, Paulo Nuno & Granado, António, 2026. "Development and validation of a scale to assess algorithmic literacy in the context of recommender systems (ALRS)," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:85:y:2026:i:c:s0160791x26000266
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2026.103237
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X26000266
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2026.103237?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:85:y:2026:i:c:s0160791x26000266. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.