Author
Listed:
- Shen, Chen
- Zeng, Hao
- Fan, Ruizhe
Abstract
As the new wave of the technological revolution accelerates, the widespread industrial robot adoption is profoundly reshaping the labor market. While existing research has predominantly focused on objective socioeconomic indicators such as employment, income, and workplace safety, the systematic impact on workers' subjective well-being (WSWB) remains largely underexplored. By integrating global robotics data from the International Federation of Robotics (IFR), micro-level firm data from China's Second National Economic Census, and micro-individual data from the China Labor-force Dynamics Survey (CLDS), this paper explores the impact and mechanisms of industrial robot adoption on WSWB in the industrial sectors of cities at or above the prefecture level in China. The research results indicate that industrial robot adoption has a significant positive effect on improving WSWB. The mechanism analysis reveals heterogeneous effects across skill levels. For high-skilled workers, robots deliver multi-dimensional benefits, including higher wages and welfare income, reduced physical labor intensity, enhanced skill development, and an improved work-life balance. For low-skilled workers, while robot-driven productivity improvements facilitate wage growth, particularly for lower-income groups, their improvements in welfare benefits, skill diversification, and health-related outcomes remain relatively limited. Moreover, heterogeneity analysis reveals that the impact of industrial robot adoption on WSWB exhibits substantial significant differences across individual, sectoral, and regional dimensions. The findings provide empirically grounded support and actionable pathways to optimize labor market structures, narrow inter-group well-being gaps, and boost national well-being as industrial robots proliferate.
Suggested Citation
Shen, Chen & Zeng, Hao & Fan, Ruizhe, 2026.
"Workers' subjective well-being in human-robot interaction: Evidence from China labor-force dynamics survey,"
Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:teinso:v:85:y:2026:i:c:s0160791x26000011
DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2026.103212
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:85:y:2026:i:c:s0160791x26000011. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.