IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v85y2026ics0160791x25003896.html

Charting the ChatGPT landscape: Insights from academic discourse on Twitter

Author

Listed:
  • Gonda, Raphael
  • Park, Jaehun

Abstract

In the wake of the emergence of ChatGPT as a transformative tool, effective policies and regulations for its integration into research and education are vital. This paper addresses challenges in the rapidly evolving AI landscape by identifying key events and discussions. To that end, the current study extracted insights from the academic community that had come during the early stages of ChatGPT's adoption. A dataset of 84,706 sentences sourced from Twitter (X.com) users in the research and academic community and collected over the course of eight months between November 2022 and June 2023 were examined using topic modeling and aspect-based sentiment analysis to explore prevailing reactions and perceptions. Nine key themes such as academic writing, coding, and time-saving tasks were identified. Strong sentiments emerged around policy debates, the issue of data security, and evolving research practices. Further, a causal analysis was performed to identify discussions and events that had triggered shifts in public sentiment. Examples include temporary restrictions on generative AI, new institutional policies, and legislative efforts to ensure responsible AI integration. This paper provides a timeline-linked perspective on how the academic community, thus far, has responded to generative AI. The findings can inform pragmatic, context-sensitive policies that foster innovation while safeguarding academic values.

Suggested Citation

  • Gonda, Raphael & Park, Jaehun, 2026. "Charting the ChatGPT landscape: Insights from academic discourse on Twitter," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:85:y:2026:i:c:s0160791x25003896
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103199
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X25003896
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103199?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:85:y:2026:i:c:s0160791x25003896. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.