IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v85y2026ics0160791x25003860.html

Paradoxical adoption of consumer-facing service technologies: Investigating the role of mindset, learning paradox, and technological context

Author

Listed:
  • Liu, Xiaodi
  • Yuen, Kum Fai
  • Su, Miao
  • Wang, Xueqin

Abstract

Human–technology interactions are often infused with paradoxes. This study adopts a paradox perspective to examine the adoption of consumer-facing service technologies (CFSTs). Specifically, we explore how experienced tension and paradoxical mindset influence users' adoption intention through two paradoxical perceptual pathways: functional perceptions (efficiency versus inefficiency) and emotional perceptions (enjoyment versus exhaustion), with learning paradox acting as a mediating mechanism (Study 1). Contextual variations between human- and technology-dominant settings are also examined (Study 2). Data were collected through an online survey of 350 participants and analysed using structural equation modelling. Study 1 shows that both experienced tension and paradoxical mindset shape the paradoxical perceptions. Efficiency and enjoyment positively affect adoption, whereas inefficiency and exhaustion exert non-significant or negative effects. Nevertheless, all perceptions influence adoption positively through the learning paradox, which shows that users transform contradictory experiences into adaptive engagement. Study 2 provides further evidence of contextual differences: paradoxical perceptions are more pronounced in technology-dominant service contexts (e.g., autonomous delivery robot) than in human-dominant contexts (e.g., self-service locker).

Suggested Citation

  • Liu, Xiaodi & Yuen, Kum Fai & Su, Miao & Wang, Xueqin, 2026. "Paradoxical adoption of consumer-facing service technologies: Investigating the role of mindset, learning paradox, and technological context," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:85:y:2026:i:c:s0160791x25003860
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103196
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X25003860
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103196?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:85:y:2026:i:c:s0160791x25003860. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.