IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v85y2026ics0160791x25003690.html

The effect of charismatic influencers on polarization online: An agent-based modeling approach

Author

Listed:
  • Betts, John M.
  • Bliuc, Ana-Maria
  • Courtney, Daniel S.

Abstract

In the face of increasing online polarization, understanding the role of charismatic influencers in shaping public discourse is crucial for those developing mitigation strategies. This study investigates the impact of influencers on the dynamics of polarization in digital environments through agent-based modeling. We examine how an influencer’s charisma and the nature of their message (moderate vs. extremist) affect the ideological and affective dimensions of polarization. Our experiments simulated interactions within an artificial society, manipulating characteristics of the influencer and the society. The results indicate that charismatic influencers with extremist messages accelerate polarization, particularly in more open societies. By contrast, charismatic influencers with moderate messages can reduce the rate of polarization and promote the formation of clusters of moderate individuals in the society. This research highlights the complex role of influencers in either exacerbating or alleviating polarization, and the importance of strategic communication by those seeking to moderate extreme views to preserve democratic values in the digital age.

Suggested Citation

  • Betts, John M. & Bliuc, Ana-Maria & Courtney, Daniel S., 2026. "The effect of charismatic influencers on polarization online: An agent-based modeling approach," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:85:y:2026:i:c:s0160791x25003690
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103179
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X25003690
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103179?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Casaló, Luis V. & Flavián, Carlos & Ibáñez-Sánchez, Sergio, 2020. "Influencers on Instagram: Antecedents and consequences of opinion leadership," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 510-519.
    2. James N. Druckman & Samara Klar & Yanna Krupnikov & Matthew Levendusky & John Barry Ryan, 2021. "Affective polarization, local contexts and public opinion in America," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 5(1), pages 28-38, January.
    3. An, Li & Grimm, Volker & Sullivan, Abigail & Turner II, B.L. & Malleson, Nicolas & Heppenstall, Alison & Vincenot, Christian & Robinson, Derek & Ye, Xinyue & Liu, Jianguo & Lindkvist, Emilie & Tang, W, 2021. "Challenges, tasks, and opportunities in modeling agent-based complex systems," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 457(C).
    4. Belch, Michael A. & Krentler, Kathleen A. & Willis-Flurry, Laura A., 2005. "Teen internet mavens: influence in family decision making," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(5), pages 569-575, May.
    5. C M Macal, 2016. "Everything you need to know about agent-based modelling and simulation," Journal of Simulation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(2), pages 144-156, May.
    6. repec:plo:pone00:0074516 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Iacopo Iacopini & Márton Karsai & Alain Barrat, 2024. "The temporal dynamics of group interactions in higher-order social networks," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-11, December.
    8. repec:nas:journl:v:115:y:2018:p:9216-9221 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Andreas Flache & Michael Mäs & Thomas Feliciani & Edmund Chattoe-Brown & Guillaume Deffuant & Sylvie Huet & Jan Lorenz, 2017. "Models of Social Influence: Towards the Next Frontiers," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 20(4), pages 1-2.
    10. Garance Genicot, 2022. "Tolerance and Compromise in Social Networks," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 130(1), pages 94-120.
    11. Jasmine Wise & Robyn Driskell, 2017. "Tolerance Within Community: Does Social Capital Affect Tolerance?," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 134(2), pages 607-629, November.
    12. Max Falkenberg & Alessandro Galeazzi & Maddalena Torricelli & Niccolò Di Marco & Francesca Larosa & Madalina Sas & Amin Mekacher & Warren Pearce & Fabiana Zollo & Walter Quattrociocchi & Andrea Baronc, 2022. "Growing polarization around climate change on social media," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 12(12), pages 1114-1121, December.
    13. Fernando P Santos & Francisco C Santos & Jorge M Pacheco, 2016. "Social Norms of Cooperation in Small-Scale Societies," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, January.
    14. Rudolf Metz & Bendegúz Plesz, 2025. "The Irresistible Allure of Charismatic Leaders? Populism, Social Identity, and Polarisation," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 13.
    15. Feng Shi & Misha Teplitskiy & Eamon Duede & James A. Evans, 2019. "The wisdom of polarized crowds," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 3(4), pages 329-336, April.
    16. Joshua M. Epstein & Robert L. Axtell, 1996. "Growing Artificial Societies: Social Science from the Bottom Up," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262550253, December.
    17. Michele Avalle & Niccolò Marco & Gabriele Etta & Emanuele Sangiorgio & Shayan Alipour & Anita Bonetti & Lorenzo Alvisi & Antonio Scala & Andrea Baronchelli & Matteo Cinelli & Walter Quattrociocchi, 2024. "Persistent interaction patterns across social media platforms and over time," Nature, Nature, vol. 628(8008), pages 582-589, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Emanuele Sangiorgio & Niccolò Di Marco & Gabriele Etta & Matteo Cinelli & Roy Cerqueti & Walter Quattrociocchi, 2025. "Evaluating the effect of viral posts on social media engagement," Post-Print hal-05109549, HAL.
    2. Daniel Torren-Peraire & Jeroen C. J. M. van den Bergh & Ivan Savin, 2025. "The Cultural Multiplier of Climate Policy," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 88(11), pages 3215-3251, November.
    3. Camelia Florela Voinea, 2020. "Political culture research: dilemmas and trends. Prologue to the special issue," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 54(2), pages 361-382, April.
    4. Giacomo Ravaioli & Tiago Domingos & Ricardo F. M. Teixeira, 2023. "A Framework for Data-Driven Agent-Based Modelling of Agricultural Land Use," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-17, March.
    5. Andrea Nasuto & Francisco Rowe, 2024. "Understanding anti-immigration sentiment spreading on Twitter," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(9), pages 1-21, September.
    6. Kunhao Yang & Mengyuan Fu, 2024. "Polarized collaboration benefits knowledge production: empirical analyses of the mediating effect of co-production pattern in Wikipedia articles on climate change," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 7(3), pages 2677-2699, December.
    7. Max Falkenberg & Fabiana Zollo & Walter Quattrociocchi & Jürgen Pfeffer & Andrea Baronchelli, 2024. "Patterns of partisan toxicity and engagement reveal the common structure of online political communication across countries," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, December.
    8. Camelia Florela Voinea & Martin Neumann, 2020. "Political culture: a theory in search for methodology. An editorial," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 54(2), pages 335-360, April.
    9. Luís de Sousa & Alberto Rodrigues da Silva, 2015. "Showcasing a Domain Specific Language for Spatial Simulation Scenarios with case studies," ERSA conference papers ersa15p1044, European Regional Science Association.
    10. Eugenio Caverzasi & Antoine Godin, 2013. "Stock-flow Consistent Modeling through the Ages," Economics Working Paper Archive wp_745, Levy Economics Institute.
    11. Luca Riccetti & Alberto Russo & Mauro Gallegati, 2015. "An agent based decentralized matching macroeconomic model," Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, Springer;Society for Economic Science with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents, vol. 10(2), pages 305-332, October.
    12. Michael J. Radzicki, 2003. "Mr. Hamilton, Mr. Forrester, and a Foundation for Evolutionary Economics," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(1), pages 133-173, March.
    13. Kazuya Yamamoto, 2015. "Mobilization, Flexibility of Identity, and Ethnic Cleavage," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 18(2), pages 1-8.
    14. Dirk Helbing & Thomas U. Grund, 2013. "Editorial: Agent-Based Modeling And Techno-Social Systems," Advances in Complex Systems (ACS), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(04n05), pages 1-3.
    15. Ross Richardson & Matteo G. Richiardi & Michael Wolfson, 2015. "We ran one billion agents. Scaling in simulation models," LABORatorio R. Revelli Working Papers Series 142, LABORatorio R. Revelli, Centre for Employment Studies.
    16. Wang, Le & Luo, Xin (Robert) & Li, Han, 2022. "Envy or conformity? An empirical investigation of peer influence on the purchase of non-functional items in mobile free-to-play games," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 308-324.
    17. Eleni Kilipiri & Eugenia Papaioannou & Iordanis Kotzaivazoglou, 2023. "Social Media and Influencer Marketing for Promoting Sustainable Tourism Destinations: The Instagram Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-18, April.
    18. Roberto Veneziani & Luca Zamparelli & Michalis Nikiforos & Gennaro Zezza, 2017. "Stock-Flow Consistent Macroeconomic Models: A Survey," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 1204-1239, December.
    19. G. David Garson, 2009. "Computerized Simulation in the Social Sciences," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 40(2), pages 267-279, April.
    20. Khalil, Elias L., 2010. "The Bayesian fallacy: Distinguishing internal motivations and religious beliefs from other beliefs," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 75(2), pages 268-280, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:85:y:2026:i:c:s0160791x25003690. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.