IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v85y2026ics0160791x25003604.html

A hybrid Bayesian BWM-machine learning framework for university digital transformation assessment: Integrating expert clustering and predictive validation

Author

Listed:
  • Lo, Huai-Wei
  • Lin, Sheng-Wei

Abstract

The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence–driven technologies has underscored the need for universities to undergo a comprehensive digital transformation. This study introduces a novel hybrid framework that combines the Bayesian best–worst method (BBWM) with machine learning techniques to identify and assess key success factors for university digital transformation. This study integrates expert clustering analysis and predictive modeling validation to provide enhanced decision support capabilities. Through systematic evaluation of 27 experts across 5 key dimensions—digital infrastructure, teaching and learning, research, administration and governance, and stakeholder engagement—the analysis revealed critical insights into transformation priorities. Clustering analysis identified seven distinct stakeholder assessment patterns, demonstrating significant heterogeneity in evaluation approaches across professional backgrounds and experience levels. Digital skills and literacy development emerged as the most influential factor, followed by the availability of online learning resources and the adequacy of network infrastructure. Methodological validation demonstrated exceptional convergence between the BBWM and traditional BWM (correlation coefficient: 0.9961), whereas machine learning validation confirmed the robustness of dimensional priority hierarchies through feature importance analysis. The hybrid framework achieved a ranking confidence of 70.23 % and provides stakeholder-specific insights for developing differentiated implementation strategies. This study contributes to the digital transformation literature by presenting the first integration of Bayesian inference and machine learning for university assessment, providing evidence-based frameworks to support strategic technology planning and resource allocation in an increasingly digital educational landscape.

Suggested Citation

  • Lo, Huai-Wei & Lin, Sheng-Wei, 2026. "A hybrid Bayesian BWM-machine learning framework for university digital transformation assessment: Integrating expert clustering and predictive validation," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:85:y:2026:i:c:s0160791x25003604
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103170
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X25003604
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103170?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Li, Huanli & Wu, Yun & Cao, Dongmei & Wang, Yichuan, 2021. "Organizational mindfulness towards digital transformation as a prerequisite of information processing capability to achieve market agility," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 700-712.
    2. Llopis-Albert, Carlos & Rubio, Francisco & Valero, Francisco, 2021. "Impact of digital transformation on the automotive industry," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    3. Lykourentzou, Maria Anna & Apostolopoulos, Nikolaos & Dabić, Marina & Liargovas, Panagiotis & Tekavčič, Metka, 2025. "Assessing the role of human factor in digital transformation projects: A systematic literature review and research agenda," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    4. Sisto, Roberta & Fernández-Portillo, Luis A. & Yazdani, Morteza & Estepa-Mohedano, Lorenzo & Torkayesh, Ali Ebadi, 2022. "Strategic planning of rural areas: Integrating participatory backcasting and multiple criteria decision analysis tools," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 82(PA).
    5. Laís Viera Trevisan & João Henrique Paulino Pires Eustachio & Bárbara Galleli Dias & Walter Leal Filho & Eugênio Ávila Pedrozo, 2024. "Digital transformation towards sustainability in higher education: state-of-the-art and future research insights," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 2789-2810, February.
    6. Terzi, Silvia & Petrarca, Francesca, 2025. "University student's opinion survey: A synthesis and a deeper insight," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    7. Gul, Muhammet & Yucesan, Melih, 2022. "Performance evaluation of Turkish Universities by an integrated Bayesian BWM-TOPSIS model," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    8. Kraus, Sascha & Durst, Susanne & Ferreira, João J. & Veiga, Pedro & Kailer, Norbert & Weinmann, Alexandra, 2022. "Digital transformation in business and management research: An overview of the current status quo," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    9. Zhao, Shuang & Zhang, Liqun & Peng, Lin & Zhou, Haiyan & Hu, Feng, 2024. "Enterprise pollution reduction through digital transformation? Evidence from Chinese manufacturing enterprises," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    10. Pavlos Delias & Fotis C. Kitsios, 2023. "Operational research and business intelligence as drivers for digital transformation," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 1-8, September.
    11. Szymkowiak, Andrzej & Melović, Boban & Dabić, Marina & Jeganathan, Kishokanth & Kundi, Gagandeep Singh, 2021. "Information technology and Gen Z: The role of teachers, the internet, and technology in the education of young people," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    12. Rezaei, Jafar, 2015. "Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 49-57.
    13. Ding, Xiaowei & Vuković, Darko B. & Sokolov, Boris I. & Vukovic, Natalia & Liu, Yali, 2024. "Enhancing ESG performance through digital transformation: Insights from China's manufacturing sector," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    14. Mohammadi, Majid & Rezaei, Jafar, 2020. "Bayesian best-worst method: A probabilistic group decision making model," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    15. Sabine Kuhlmann & Moritz Heuberger, 2023. "Digital transformation going local: implementation, impacts and constraints from a German perspective," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(2), pages 147-155, February.
    16. Zofio, Jose Luis & Aparicio, Juan & Barbero, Javier & Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, Jon Mikel, 2024. "Benchmarking performance through efficiency analysis trees: Improvement strategies for colombian higher education institutions," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Göçmen Polat, Elifcan & Yücesan, Melih & Gül, Muhammet, 2023. "A comparative framework for criticality assessment of strategic raw materials in Turkey," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    2. Sarkar, Bishal Dey & Shardeo, Vipulesh & Dwivedi, Ashish & Pamucar, Dragan, 2024. "Digital transition from industry 4.0 to industry 5.0 in smart manufacturing: A framework for sustainable future," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    3. Karadag, Mehmet & Gul, Muhammet & Yucesan, Melih & Ortiz-Barrios, Miguel & Ishizaka, Alessio & Khan, Jehangir, 2025. "Evaluation of Green Deal compliance performance with a hybrid comparative multi-attribute decision model," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    4. Peykani, Pejman & Emrouznejad, Ali & Nouri, Mojtaba, 2026. "Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method: A review of the literature," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    5. Ding, Xiangan & Appolloni, Andrea & Shahzad, Mohsin & Liu, Yue & Han, Shaojie, 2025. "Digital transformation and total factor productivity in manufacturing firms: Evidence of corporate public responsibilities in China," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    6. Amoozad Mahdiraji, Hannan & Sharifpour Arabi, Hojatallah & Duan, Keru & Vrontis, Demetris, 2025. "Harnessing technological resources for effective growth hacking: A mixed-method framework using systematic literature review, content analysis, and multi-layer decision-Making," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    7. Sarfaraz Hashemkhani Zolfani & Ramin Bazrafshan & Fatih Ecer & Çağlar Karamaşa, 2022. "The Suitability-Feasibility-Acceptability Strategy Integrated with Bayesian BWM-MARCOS Methods to Determine the Optimal Lithium Battery Plant Located in South America," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(14), pages 1-18, July.
    8. Dilupa Nakandala & Yung Po Tsang & Henry Lau & Carman Ka Man Lee, 2022. "An Industrial Blockchain-Based Multi-Criteria Decision Framework for Global Freight Management in Agricultural Supply Chains," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(19), pages 1-23, September.
    9. Corrente, Salvatore & Greco, Salvatore & Rezaei, Jafar, 2024. "Better decisions with less cognitive load: The Parsimonious BWM," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    10. Vieira, Fabiana C. & Ferreira, Fernando A.F. & Govindan, Kannan & Ferreira, Neuza C.M.Q.F. & Banaitis, Audrius, 2022. "Measuring urban digitalization using cognitive mapping and the best worst method (BWM)," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    11. Yang, Hua & Xu, Yong & Zhou, Kan & Li, Jiuyi, 2024. "Mapping development potential and priority zones for utility-scale photovoltaic on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(PA).
    12. Gul, Muhammet & Yucesan, Melih, 2022. "Performance evaluation of Turkish Universities by an integrated Bayesian BWM-TOPSIS model," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    13. Lin, Xueshan & Huang, Tao & Bompard, Ettore & Wang, Beibei & Zheng, Yaxian, 2023. "Ex-ante market power evaluation and mitigation in day-ahead electricity market considering market maturity levels," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    14. Carman-Ka-Man Lee & Lucas Lui & Yung-Po Tsang, 2021. "Formulation and Prioritization of Sustainable New Product Design in Smart Glasses Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-18, September.
    15. Zsombor Szádoczki & Sándor Bozóki & Patrik Juhász & Sergii V. Kadenko & Vitaliy Tsyganok, 2023. "Incomplete pairwise comparison matrices based on graphs with average degree approximately 3," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 326(2), pages 783-807, July.
    16. Vineet Kaushik & Shobha Tewari, 2023. "Modeling Opportunity Indicators Fostering Social Entrepreneurship: A Hybrid Delphi and Best-Worst Approach," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 168(1), pages 667-698, August.
    17. Alexandra RADU & Mihaela HERCIU, 2025. "Data Analytics, Decision-Making Process And Business Performance: A Bibliometric Analysis," Studies in Business and Economics, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 20(2), pages 292-313, August.
    18. Jian Wang & Jin-Chun Huang & Shan-Lin Huang & Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng & Ting Zhu, 2021. "Improvement Path for Resource-Constrained Cities Identified Using an Environmental Co-Governance Assessment Framework Based on BWM-mV Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-30, May.
    19. Mohammad Zahirul Khaiyum & Sudipa Sarker & Golam Kabir, 2023. "Evaluation of Carbon Emission Factors in the Cement Industry: An Emerging Economy Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-15, October.
    20. Wu, Qun & Liu, Xinwang & Zhou, Ligang & Qin, Jindong & Rezaei, Jafar, 2024. "An analytical framework for the best–worst method," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:85:y:2026:i:c:s0160791x25003604. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.