IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v84y2026ics0160791x2500291x.html

Towards digitalization for comprehensive measurement of the bioeconomy: exploring the convergence between elements of the cyber-physical social system

Author

Listed:
  • Leavy, Sebastián
  • Allegretti, Gabriela
  • Presotto, Elen
  • Montoya, Marco Antonio
  • Talamini, Edson

Abstract

The bioeconomy is an evolving concept that faces measurement challenges due to the scarcity of up-to-date, structured, and comprehensive data. We argue that digital technologies—including artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning (ML), automation, sensors and biosensors, blockchain and the Internet of Things (IoT)—can enhance the bioeconomy measurement. However, there is currently no clear evidence linking the elements of the cyber-physical social system (CPSS) within the conceptual scopes of the bioeconomy. So, this study explores the convergence between digital technologies and the conceptual elements of bioeconomy. Firstly, independent literature reviews were conducted using Biblioshiny, VOSviewer, QDA Miner and WordStat to (i) define the core terms in the scope of bioeconomy concepts and (ii) map the digital technologies. Secondly, we coded and analyzed the literature content with QDA Miner and WordStat to examine the co-occurrence of digital technologies and the conceptual elements of the bioeconomy. The results indicate that the Biomass-Based Bioeconomy (BmBB), Biotechnology-Based Bioeconomy (BtBB), and Biosphere-Based Bioeconomy (BsBB) possess distinct clusters of conceptual elements but also integrative domains, like metabolism. Our findings reveal that digital technologies within categories of data science and analytics, computing and software, and imaging and sensing have been the most prevalent in the bioeconomy context. Evidence has surfaced regarding the interactions between the bioeconomy concepts and digital technologies, illustrating the role of digitization in enhancing data collection, storage, processing and communication across various aspects of the bioeconomy. This evidence underscores the potential of digitalization for a comprehensive measure of the bioeconomy. Ultimately, this research provides valuable insights for improving bioeconomy assessment and supports sustainability goals by integrating emerging digital technologies with the bioeconomy development.

Suggested Citation

  • Leavy, Sebastián & Allegretti, Gabriela & Presotto, Elen & Montoya, Marco Antonio & Talamini, Edson, 2026. "Towards digitalization for comprehensive measurement of the bioeconomy: exploring the convergence between elements of the cyber-physical social system," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:84:y:2026:i:c:s0160791x2500291x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103101
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X2500291X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103101?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aria, Massimo & Cuccurullo, Corrado, 2017. "bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 11(4), pages 959-975.
    2. Fox, Stephen & Griffy-Brown, Charla & Dabic, Marina, 2020. "From socio-technical systems to biosocial technical systems: New themes and new guidance for the field of technology in society," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    3. Qi, Ruijuan & Ma, Guowei & Liu, Chang & Zhang, Qiwen & Wang, Qianyi, 2024. "Enterprise digital transformation and supply chain resilience," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    4. Simionescu, Mihaela & Radulescu, Magdalena & Cifuentes-Faura, Javier, 2024. "The role of natural resources rents and e-government in achieving sustainable development in the European Union," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    5. Ronzon, Tévécia & Iost, Susanne & Philippidis, George, 2022. "An output-based measurement of EU bioeconomy services: Marrying statistics with policy insight," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 290-301.
    6. Vivien, F.-D. & Nieddu, M. & Befort, N. & Debref, R. & Giampietro, M., 2019. "The Hijacking of the Bioeconomy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 189-197.
    7. Christina-Ioanna Papadopoulou & Efstratios Loizou & Fotios Chatzitheodoridis, 2022. "Priorities in Bioeconomy Strategies: A Systematic Literature Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-15, October.
    8. Sebastián Leavy & Gabriela Allegretti & Elen Presotto & Marco Antonio Montoya & Edson Talamini, 2024. "Measuring the Bioeconomy Economically: Exploring the Connections between Concepts, Methods, Data, Indicators and Their Limitations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-32, October.
    9. Jeff Alstott & Ed Bullmore & Dietmar Plenz, 2014. "powerlaw: A Python Package for Analysis of Heavy-Tailed Distributions," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(1), pages 1-11, January.
    10. Wolfgang Onyeali & Michael P. Schlaile & Bastian Winkler, 2023. "Navigating the Biocosmos: Cornerstones of a Bioeconomic Utopia," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-32, June.
    11. Nicolas Befort & Florence de Fouchécour & Aliénor de Rouffignac & Christopher Holt & Margot Leclere & Teddy Loth & Roman Moscoviz & Florian F. Pion & Jean-François Ruault & Marina Thierry, 2019. "Toward a European bioeconomic transition: is a soft shift enough to challenge hard socio-ecological issues? [Vers une transition bioéconomique en Europe : une transition douce est-elle suffisante pour relever les difficiles défis socio-écologiques," Post-Print hal-02929658, HAL.
    12. Finn Danielsen & Natasha Ali & Herizo T. Andrianandrasana & Andrea Baquero & Umai Basilius & Pedro Araujo Lima Constantino & Katherine Despot-Belmonte & Per Ole Frederiksen & Maxim Isaac & PâviâraK Ja, 2024. "Involving citizens in monitoring the Kunming–Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 7(12), pages 1730-1739, December.
    13. Liu, Haiying & Khan, Irfan & Zakari, Abdulrasheed & Alharthi, Majed, 2022. "Roles of trilemma in the world energy sector and transition towards sustainable energy: A study of economic growth and the environment," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    14. Oecd, 2024. "Shaping a rights-oriented digital transformation," OECD Digital Economy Papers 368, OECD Publishing.
    15. Yuanyuan Wang & Jijie Ma & Kun Zhang, 2024. "Can digital transformation reduce corporate illegality?," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(2), pages 1090-1109, July.
    16. Sebasti'an Leavy & Gabriela Allegretti & Elen Presotto & Marco Antonio Montoya & Edson Talamini, 2024. "Measuring the bioeconomy economically: exploring the connections between concepts, methods, data, indicators and their limitations," Papers 2403.08886, arXiv.org.
    17. Luhas, Jukka & Mikkilä, Mirja, 2025. "Social sustainability in the forest-based bioeconomy: A narrative review," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    18. Nicolas Béfort & Martino Nieddu, 2020. "Bioéconomie : un retour historique sur deux problématisations de l’usage des ressources renouvelables," Post-Print hal-03243019, HAL.
    19. Tévécia Ronzon & Stephan Piotrowski & Saulius Tamosiunas & Lara Dammer & Michael Carus & Robert M’barek, 2020. "Developments of Economic Growth and Employment in Bioeconomy Sectors across the EU," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-13, June.
    20. Markus M. Bugge & Teis Hansen & Antje Klitkou, 2016. "What Is the Bioeconomy? A Review of the Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-22, July.
    21. Giampietro, Mario, 2019. "On the Circular Bioeconomy and Decoupling: Implications for Sustainable Growth," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 143-156.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Benoit Mougenot & Jean-Pierre Doussoulin, 2022. "Conceptual evolution of the bioeconomy: a bibliometric analysis," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 1031-1047, January.
    2. Lhuillery, Stephane & Befort, Nicolas & Atmane, Samih, 2025. "Biotechnology or bioeconomy: Six of one and half a dozen of the other?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    3. Befort, N., 2020. "Going beyond definitions to understand tensions within the bioeconomy: The contribution of sociotechnical regimes to contested fields," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    4. Wolfgang Onyeali & Michael P. Schlaile & Bastian Winkler, 2023. "Navigating the Biocosmos: Cornerstones of a Bioeconomic Utopia," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-32, June.
    5. Conteratto, Caroline & Artuzo, Felipe Dalzotto & Benedetti Santos, Omar Inácio & Talamini, Edson, 2021. "Biorefinery: A comprehensive concept for the sociotechnical transition toward bioeconomy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    6. Jim Philp, 2021. "Biotechnologies to Bridge the Schism in the Bioeconomy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-19, December.
    7. Maria Sylvia Macchione Saes & Beatriz Macchione Saes & Elis Regina Monte Feitosa & Peter Poschen & Adalberto Luis Val & Jacques Marcovitch, 2023. "When Do Supply Chains Strengthen Biological and Cultural Diversity? Methods and Indicators for the Socio-Biodiversity Bioeconomy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-18, May.
    8. Fischer, Lennart & Losacker, Sebastian & Wydra, Sven, 2024. "National specialization and diversification in the bioeconomy: Insights from biobased technologies in chemical and pharmaceutical sectors," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    9. Roma Ryś-Jurek, 2022. "Interdependence between Energy Cost and Financial Situation of the EU Agricultural Farms—Towards the Implementation of the Bioeconomy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-14, November.
    10. Sebastián Leavy & Gabriela Allegretti & Elen Presotto & Marco Antonio Montoya & Edson Talamini, 2024. "Measuring the Bioeconomy Economically: Exploring the Connections between Concepts, Methods, Data, Indicators and Their Limitations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-32, October.
    11. Christina-Ioanna Papadopoulou & Efstratios Loizou & Fotios Chatzitheodoridis, 2022. "Priorities in Bioeconomy Strategies: A Systematic Literature Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-15, October.
    12. D'Adamo, Idiano & Falcone, Pasquale Marcello & Imbert, Enrica & Morone, Piergiuseppe, 2020. "A Socio-economic Indicator for EoL Strategies for Bio-based Products," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    13. Grouiez, Pascal & Debref, Romain & Vivien, Franck-Dominique & Befort, Nicolas, 2023. "The complex relationships between non-food agriculture and the sustainable bioeconomy: The French case," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    14. Daniela Firoiu & George H. Ionescu & Teodor Marian Cojocaru & Mariana Niculescu & Maria Nache Cimpoeru & Oana Alexandra Călin, 2023. "Progress of EU Member States Regarding the Bioeconomy and Biomass Producing and Converting Sectors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-22, September.
    15. Xiaofei Jia & Lichao Lin & Ziling Huang, 2025. "Transformative forces: how capital intensity and technological innovation shape digital evolution in Chinese enterprises," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 15(4), pages 1205-1224, December.
    16. Weiss, Gerhard & Hansen, Eric & Ludvig, Alice & Nybakk, Erlend & Toppinen, Anne, 2021. "Innovation governance in the forest sector: Reviewing concepts, trends and gaps," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    17. Christina-Ioanna Papadopoulou & Angeliki Foutri & George Martinidis & Theodora Kalea & Yannis Fallas, 2025. "Developing Blueprints for Robust Regional Bioeconomy Strategies: The Case of Western Macedonia," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-20, February.
    18. Lühmann, Malte & Vogelpohl, Thomas, 2023. "The bioeconomy in Germany: A failing political project?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    19. Rebolledo-Leiva, Ricardo & Moreira, María Teresa & González-García, Sara, 2023. "Progress of social assessment in the framework of bioeconomy under a life cycle perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    20. Sebastian Hinderer & Leif Brändle & Andreas Kuckertz, 2021. "Transition to a Sustainable Bioeconomy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-16, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:84:y:2026:i:c:s0160791x2500291x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.