IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v84y2026ics0160791x25002866.html

The moderating role of modularity in the relationship between technological turbulence and dominant design influence held by patent pools

Author

Listed:
  • Peng, Chen
  • Zhang, Yunsheng
  • Lai, Liubin

Abstract

We explore how the modular design of patent pools shapes their dominant position in technologically turbulent environments, offering both theoretical reasoning and empirical evidence on the causal link between modularity and dominant-design formation. Using 151 patent-pool–year observations drawn from the MPEG-LA, Derwent, and Compustat databases (1994–2020), we find that: (1) technological turbulence has an inverted-U effect on a pool's likelihood of achieving dominant-design status, with moderate turbulence opening a “window of opportunity”; (2) at moderate turbulence, organizational modularity strengthens dominance, whereas vertical integration becomes more effective under high turbulence; (3) although deep technological modularity accelerates dominance, it simultaneously threatens operational stability. By integrating patent pools—an organizational form that fuses R&D and market functions—into the SCP framework, we confirm the paradigm's validity for centralized intellectual-property governance and provide contextual guidance for firms' technology-standardization strategies and patent-pool governance.

Suggested Citation

  • Peng, Chen & Zhang, Yunsheng & Lai, Liubin, 2026. "The moderating role of modularity in the relationship between technological turbulence and dominant design influence held by patent pools," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:84:y:2026:i:c:s0160791x25002866
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103096
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X25002866
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103096?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:84:y:2026:i:c:s0160791x25002866. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.