IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v84y2026ics0160791x25002465.html

Impact of the digital economy on college graduates' return-to-hometown employment: Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Feng, Zhidong
  • Yong, Mei

Abstract

This study leverages push–pull theory and social capital theory and data from four waves (2016–2022) of the China Family Panel Studies to systematically investigate how the digital economy influences the return-to-hometown employment decisions of college graduates. The results offer several insights. First, the digital economy significantly increases the probability that graduates will return to their hometowns for employment, and this positive effect shows a consistent upward trend over the study period. Second, mechanism analysis reveals that the digital economy attracts graduates back home by primarily facilitating industrial upgrading in their hometowns, with this mediating pathway accounting for 45.73 % of the total effect. Third, social trust exerts a differentiated moderating effect: while particularized and generalized trust exert negative moderating effects, institutional trust not only directly encourages return decisions but also significantly amplifies the positive influence of the digital economy. Fourth, the promotional effect of the digital economy is more pronounced among students from central and eastern regions, with highly educated parents, and with bachelor’s degrees or below, as well as among female graduates. Fifth, the digital economy is fostering a structural shift toward entrepreneurship in return-to-hometown employment. Sixth, it significantly improves the settlement stability of returning graduates. Accordingly, this study suggests that accelerating industrial upgrading, enhancing the credibility of local governments, and optimizing the entrepreneurial environment are crucial to maximizing the digital economy’s role in supporting the return and retention of talent.

Suggested Citation

  • Feng, Zhidong & Yong, Mei, 2026. "Impact of the digital economy on college graduates' return-to-hometown employment: Evidence from China," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:84:y:2026:i:c:s0160791x25002465
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103056
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X25002465
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103056?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Au, Chun-Chung & Henderson, J. Vernon, 2006. "How migration restrictions limit agglomeration and productivity in China," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(2), pages 350-388, August.
    2. Sotiris Blanas & Gino Gancia & Sang Yoon (Tim) Lee, 2019. "Who is afraid of machines?," Economic Policy, CEPR, CESifo, Sciences Po;CES;MSH, vol. 34(100), pages 627-690.
    3. Everett Lee, 1966. "A theory of migration," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 3(1), pages 47-57, March.
    4. Francisco Simões & Antonella Rocca & Rui Rocha & Carlos Mateus & Elena Marta & Jale Tosun, 2021. "Time to Get Emotional: Determinants of University Students’ Intention to Return to Rural Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-12, May.
    5. Pil Sun Heo & Duk Hee Lee, 2019. "Evolution of the linkage structure of ICT industry and its role in the economic system: the case of Korea," Information Technology for Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(3), pages 424-454, July.
    6. Robert M. Sauer, 2015. "Does It Pay For Women To Volunteer?," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 56(2), pages 537-564, May.
    7. Gibbs, Robert M., 1995. "Going Away to College and Wider Urban Job Opportunities Take Highly Educated Youth Away from Rural Areas," Rural America/ Rural Development Perspectives, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, vol. 10(3), June.
    8. Jing Wang & Zhanggong Tian & Yi Sun, 2024. "Digital Economy, Employment Structure and Labor Share," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-16, November.
    9. Hetherington, Marc J., 1998. "The Political Relevance of Political Trust," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 92(4), pages 791-808, December.
    10. K. J. Arrow, 1971. "The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: F. H. Hahn (ed.), Readings in the Theory of Growth, chapter 11, pages 131-149, Palgrave Macmillan.
    11. Jin, Xing & Lyu, Kangyin, 2024. "The impact of digital economy on emerging employment trends: Insights from the China Family Panel Survey (CFPS)," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    12. Robert M. Sauer, 2015. "Does It Pay For Women To Volunteer?," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 56, pages 537-564, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jane Parry & Katherine Brookfield & Vicki Bolton, 2021. "“The long arm of the household”: Gendered struggles in combining paid work with social and civil participation over the lifecourse," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 361-378, January.
    2. Paul Dolan & Christian Krekel & Helen Lee & Claire Marshall & Ganga Shreedhar & Allison Smith, 2021. "Happy to help: The welfare effects of a nationwide micro-volunteering programme," CEP Discussion Papers dp1772, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    3. Stijn Baert & Sunčica Vujić, 2018. "Does it pay to care? Volunteering and employment opportunities," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 31(3), pages 819-836, July.
    4. Thomas Zimmerfaust, 2018. "Are Workers Willing To Pay To Join A Better Team?," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 56(2), pages 1278-1295, April.
    5. Andrew T. Ching & Tülin Erdem & Michael P. Keane, 2017. "Empirical Models of Learning Dynamics: A Survey of Recent Developments," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Berend Wierenga & Ralf van der Lans (ed.), Handbook of Marketing Decision Models, edition 2, chapter 0, pages 223-257, Springer.
    6. Eva Van Belle & Ralf Caers & Marijke De Couck & Valentina Di Stasio & Stijn Baert, 2019. "The Signal of Applying for a Job Under a Vacancy Referral Scheme," Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(2), pages 251-274, April.
    7. Georganas, Sotiris & Laliotis, Ioannis & Velias, Alina, 2022. "The best is yet to come: The impact of retirement on prosocial behavior," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 589-615.
    8. Guido Cozzi & Noemi Mantovan & Robert M. Sauer, 2017. "Does it Pay to Work for Free? Negative Selection and the Wage Returns to Volunteer Experience," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 79(6), pages 1018-1045, December.
    9. Guo, Di & Jiang, Kun & Xu, Chenggang & Yang, Xiyi, 2023. "Geographic clusters, regional productivity and resource reallocation across firms: Evidence from China," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(2).
    10. Baert, Stijn & Vujic, Suncica, 2016. "Does It Pay to Care? Prosocial Engagement and Employment Opportunities," IZA Discussion Papers 9649, IZA Network @ LISER.
    11. Christian Belzil & Jorgen Hansen & Xingfei Liu, 2017. "Dynamic skill accumulation, education policies, and the return to schooling," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 8(3), pages 895-927, November.
    12. Dan Anderberg & Noemi Mantovan & Robert M Sauer, 2023. "The Dynamics of Domestic Violence: Learning about the Match," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 133(656), pages 2863-2898.
    13. Zhu, Rong, 2021. "Retirement and voluntary work provision: Evidence from the Australian Age Pension reform," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 674-690.
    14. Xu, Cheng-Gang & Guo, Di & Jiang, Kun & Yang, Xiyi, 2017. "Clustering, Growth, and Inequality in China," CEPR Discussion Papers 12543, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    15. Jack Britton & Ben Waltmann, 2021. "Revisiting the solution of dynamic discrete choice models: time to bring back Keane and Wolpin (1994)?," IFS Working Papers W21/13, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    16. Alfonso-Costillo, Antonio & Morales-Sánchez, Rafael & López-Pintado, Dunia, 2021. "Does volunteering increase employment opportunities? An experimental approach," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    17. Li, Jing & Wu, Maohua & Zhao, Chining, 2025. "High housing prices and low social integration of China’s new generation migrants in cities," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    18. Lu, Yi & Ni, Juan & Tao, Zhigang & Yu, Linhui, 2013. "City–industry growth in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 135-147.
    19. Robert M. Sauer & Noemi Mantovan & Guido Cozzi, 2025. "How Do Mental and Physical Health Influence Career and Family Choices?," CHILD Working Papers Series 122 JEL Classification: C, Centre for Household, Income, Labour and Demographic Economics (CHILD) - CCA.
    20. Xu, Cheng-Gang & Guo, Di & Jiang, Kun & Yang, Xiyi, 2020. "Geographic Clustering and Resource Reallocation Across Firms in Chinese Industries," CEPR Discussion Papers 14506, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:84:y:2026:i:c:s0160791x25002465. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.