IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v84y2026ics0160791x25002428.html

AI FoMO (fear of missing out) in the workplace

Author

Listed:
  • Méndez-Suárez, Mariano
  • Ćukušić, Maja
  • Ninčević-Pašalić, Ivana

Abstract

While AI is credited with improving productivity, automating repetitive tasks, and fostering safer work environments, it also raises employee concerns about job security, reduced autonomy, and the perceived obsolescence of their skills. This study focuses on the fear of being left behind, or fear of missing out (FoMO), to understand employees' perceptions of AI adoption. Using data from the latest OECD study on AI in the workplace, specifically focusing on workers who had been using AI over an extended period of time, this article applies Fuzzy Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA) to examine the relationships between employee control over decision making, mental health impacts, concerns about AI oversight (“robo-boss”), and skill devaluation. Results reveal multiple causal pathways to FoMO, where combinations of perceived skill devaluation, lost autonomy, and concerns over AI supervision are key drivers of this anxiety. As the study reveals, employees who perceive AI to reduce their decision-making autonomy are significantly more likely to experience FoMO, amplifying the psychological impact of automation on job anxiety. Conversely, positive perceptions of AI's role in supporting well-being and maintaining decision-making authority mitigate FoMO. The study highlights the importance of promoting transparent communication, ongoing training, and inclusive AI implementation strategies to address emotional responses and improve workforce adaptability. To ensure a balanced transition to AI-enabled workplaces, organizations must integrate AI in a way that empowers employees, rather than exacerbating fears of obsolescence.

Suggested Citation

  • Méndez-Suárez, Mariano & Ćukušić, Maja & Ninčević-Pašalić, Ivana, 2026. "AI FoMO (fear of missing out) in the workplace," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:84:y:2026:i:c:s0160791x25002428
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103052
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X25002428
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103052?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:84:y:2026:i:c:s0160791x25002428. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.