IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v83y2025ics0160791x2500226x.html

Generative AI as a source of information on environmental Problems: Understanding its influence on Generation Z

Author

Listed:
  • Rodriguez-Sanchez, Carla
  • Sancho-Esper, Franco Manuel
  • Casaló, Luis Vicente
  • López, Manuela

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is rapidly emerging as a transformative tool in digital information dissemination. However, its influence on environmental communication problems remains underexplored. This research examines whether exposure to information on an environmental problem provided by GenAI (namely ChatGPT) influences individuals' pro-environmental outcomes in terms of awareness of environmental consequences, moral obligation, and attitudes toward that problem. It addresses the research gap on GenAI's effectiveness compared to traditional sources (digital newspapers) in shaping environmental perceptions, as well as the underlying mechanisms behind this effectiveness. Two experimental studies were conducted with samples of Generation Z users given this demographic's high level of engagement with AI tools. Study 1 examined changes in pro-environmental outcomes when participants were exposed to ChatGPT-generated messages about water scarcity or messages in a digital newspaper. Study 2 focused on the underlying mechanisms of ChatGPT's influence. It examined how perceived usefulness of information mediates this influence and how individual characteristics (psychological distance to the problem and technological innovativeness) moderate this process. Exposure to messages about water scarcity significantly enhanced participants' awareness of consequences, moral obligation, and attitudes toward the problem, regardless of the source. In Study 2, emphasizing problem severity enhanced perceived usefulness, a key factor in shaping pro-environmental outcomes. However, this effect varied based on individual characteristics, with moderation by psychological distance and technological innovativeness. These findings contribute to the growing discussion about the role of GenAI in environmental communication. The paper discusses the potential implications of GenAI for fostering pro-environmental attitudes and behaviors. It emphasizes the need to consider audience-specific factors to maximize the effectiveness of GenAI.

Suggested Citation

  • Rodriguez-Sanchez, Carla & Sancho-Esper, Franco Manuel & Casaló, Luis Vicente & López, Manuela, 2025. "Generative AI as a source of information on environmental Problems: Understanding its influence on Generation Z," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:83:y:2025:i:c:s0160791x2500226x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103036
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X2500226X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103036?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Park, Jeongeun & Oh, Changhoon & Kim, Ha Young, 2024. "AI vs. human-generated content and accounts on Instagram: User preferences, evaluations, and ethical considerations," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    2. Dwivedi, Yogesh K. & Hughes, Laurie & Kar, Arpan Kumar & Baabdullah, Abdullah M. & Grover, Purva & Abbas, Roba & Andreini, Daniela & Abumoghli, Iyad & Barlette, Yves & Bunker, Deborah & Chandra Kruse,, 2022. "Climate change and COP26: Are digital technologies and information management part of the problem or the solution? An editorial reflection and call to action," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    3. Martin R. Zemborain & Gita Venkataramani Johar, 2007. "Attitudinal Ambivalence and Openness to Persuasion: A Framework for Interpersonal Influence," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 33(4), pages 506-514, December.
    4. Nishant, Rohit & Kennedy, Mike & Corbett, Jacqueline, 2020. "Artificial intelligence for sustainability: Challenges, opportunities, and a research agenda," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    5. van der Linden, Sander, 2014. "On the relationship between personal experience, affect and risk perception: the case of climate change," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 57689, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. Ritu Agarwal & Jayesh Prasad, 1998. "A Conceptual and Operational Definition of Personal Innovativeness in the Domain of Information Technology," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 9(2), pages 204-215, June.
    7. Tversky, Amos & Kahneman, Daniel, 1992. "Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 5(4), pages 297-323, October.
    8. Arce-Urriza, Marta & Chocarro, Raquel & Cortiñas, Mónica & Marcos-Matás, Gustavo, 2025. "From familiarity to acceptance: The impact of Generative Artificial Intelligence on consumer adoption of retail chatbots," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    9. Thakur, Ramendra & Angriawan, Arifin & Summey, John H., 2016. "Technological opinion leadership: The role of personal innovativeness, gadget love, and technological innovativeness," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(8), pages 2764-2773.
    10. Ajzen, Icek, 1991. "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 179-211, December.
    11. Carla Rodriguez-Sanchez, 2023. "The role of social marketing in achieving the planet sustainable development goals (SDGs)," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 20(3), pages 559-571, September.
    12. Jeff Christensen & Jared M. Hansen & Paul Wilson, 2025. "Understanding the role and impact of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) hallucination within consumers’ tourism decision-making processes," Current Issues in Tourism, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(4), pages 545-560, February.
    13. Jeon, June & Kim, Lanu & Park, Jaehyuk, 2025. "The ethics of generative AI in social science research: A qualitative approach for institutionally grounded AI research ethics," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    14. Pan, Shan L. & Carter, Lemuria & Tim, Yenni & Sandeep, M.S., 2022. "Digital sustainability, climate change, and information systems solutions: Opportunities for future research," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    15. Torrent-Sellens, Joan & Enache-Zegheru, Mihaela & Ficapal-Cusí, Pilar, 2025. "Twin transitions or a meeting of strangers? Unravelling the effects of AI and innovations on economic, social and environmental MSMEs sustainability," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    16. Maxwell T. Boykoff & Tom Yulsman, 2013. "Political economy, media, and climate change: sinews of modern life," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 4(5), pages 359-371, September.
    17. K Akdim & Luis V. Casaló, 2023. "Perceived value of AI-based recommendations service: the case of voice assistants," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 17(1), pages 81-112, March.
    18. Daniel Belanche & Russell W. Belk & Luis V. Casaló & Carlos Flavián, 2024. "The dark side of artificial intelligence in services," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(3-4), pages 149-172, March.
    19. Michael Siegrist & Joseph Árvai, 2020. "Risk Perception: Reflections on 40 Years of Research," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(S1), pages 2191-2206, November.
    20. Ropret Homar, Aja & Knežević Cvelbar, Ljubica, 2021. "The effects of framing on environmental decisions: A systematic literature review," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    21. Kreps, Sarah & McCain, R. Miles & Brundage, Miles, 2022. "All the News That’s Fit to Fabricate: AI-Generated Text as a Tool of Media Misinformation," Journal of Experimental Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 9(1), pages 104-117, March.
    22. Craig, Christopher A. & Allen, Myria W., 2014. "Enhanced understanding of energy ratepayers: Factors influencing perceptions of government energy efficiency subsidies and utility alternative energy use," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 224-233.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. WeiYu Ji & Edwin H. W. Chan, 2019. "Critical Factors Influencing the Adoption of Smart Home Energy Technology in China: A Guangdong Province Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-24, November.
    2. Susan A. Brown & Viswanath Venkatesh & Sandeep Goyal, 2012. "Expectation Confirmation in Technology Use," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 23(2), pages 474-487, June.
    3. Marie-Eve Laporte & Géraldine Michel & Sophie Rieunier, 2017. "Towards a better understanding of eating behaviour through the concept of Perception of Nutritional Risk," Post-Print halshs-02923251, HAL.
    4. Alalwan, Ali Abdallah & Baabdullah, Abdullah M. & Rana, Nripendra P. & Tamilmani, Kuttimani & Dwivedi, Yogesh K., 2018. "Examining adoption of mobile internet in Saudi Arabia: Extending TAM with perceived enjoyment, innovativeness and trust," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 100-110.
    5. Hajiheydari, Nastaran & Delgosha, Mohammad Soltani & Olya, Hossein, 2021. "Scepticism and resistance to IoMT in healthcare: Application of behavioural reasoning theory with configurational perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    6. Riffat Ara Zannat Tama & Md Mahmudul Hoque & Ying Liu & Mohammad Jahangir Alam & Mark Yu, 2023. "An Application of Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) to Examining Farmers’ Behavioral Attitude and Intention towards Conservation Agriculture in Bangladesh," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-22, February.
    7. Salminah, Mimi & Loch, Adam & Prowse, Thomas A.A. & O'Connor, Patrick J., 2026. "Formation of biodiversity restoration payment acceptance: A review from socio-psychological and experimental economic perspectives," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    8. Jeeyeon Jeong & Yaeri Kim & Taewoo Roh, 2021. "Do Consumers Care About Aesthetics and Compatibility? The Intention to Use Wearable Devices in Health Care," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, August.
    9. Amit Shankar & Biplab Datta, 2018. "Factors Affecting Mobile Payment Adoption Intention: An Indian Perspective," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 19(3_suppl), pages 72-89, June.
    10. Gansser, Oliver Alexander & Reich, Christina Stefanie, 2021. "A new acceptance model for artificial intelligence with extensions to UTAUT2: An empirical study in three segments of application," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    11. Tsai, Pei-Hsuan & Tang, Jia-Wei & Ou, Mei-Ling, 2024. "Applying the extended UTAUT-2 to assess the factors contributing to consumers’ usage intention towards over-the-top video streaming platforms," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    12. Xinlu Wen & Marios Sotiriadis & Shiwei Shen, 2023. "Determining the Key Drivers for the Acceptance and Usage of AR and VR in Cultural Heritage Monuments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-24, February.
    13. Yaprak, Ümit & Kılıç, Fatih & Okumuş, Abdullah, 2021. "Is the Covid-19 pandemic strong enough to change the online order delivery methods? Changes in the relationship between attitude and behavior towards order delivery by drone," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    14. Attié, Elodie & Meyer-Waarden, Lars, 2022. "The acceptance and usage of smart connected objects according to adoption stages: an enhanced technology acceptance model integrating the diffusion of innovation, uses and gratification and privacy calculus theories," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    15. Farzaneh Soleimani Zoghi, "undated". "An Empirical Study On The Impact Of Risk Perception On German Consumers Online Buying Intention," Review of Socio - Economic Perspectives 201935, Reviewsep.
    16. Wenjuan Fan & Jingnan Liu & Shuwan Zhu & Panos M. Pardalos, 2020. "Investigating the impacting factors for the healthcare professionals to adopt artificial intelligence-based medical diagnosis support system (AIMDSS)," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 294(1), pages 567-592, November.
    17. Ivonne Angelica Castiblanco Jimenez & Laura Cristina Cepeda García & Maria Grazia Violante & Federica Marcolin & Enrico Vezzetti, 2020. "Commonly Used External TAM Variables in e-Learning, Agriculture and Virtual Reality Applications," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-21, December.
    18. José Alberto Martínez-González & Eduardo Parra-López & Almudena Barrientos-Báez, 2021. "Young Consumers’ Intention to Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Integrated Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-21, January.
    19. Ding, Yihong & Robinson, Elizabeth & Balcombe, Kelvin, 2025. "The role of experience in climate adaptation: Evidence from a field experiment in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 94(PB).
    20. Helena Hansson & Carl Johan Lagerkvist, 2014. "Decision Making for Animal Health and Welfare: Integrating Risk‐Benefit Analysis with Prospect Theory," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(6), pages 1149-1159, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:83:y:2025:i:c:s0160791x2500226x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.