Author
Listed:
- Hajdas, Monika
- Radomska, Joanna
- Szpulak, Aleksandra
- Kawa, Arkadiusz
Abstract
Metaverse, considered one of the decade's most transformative technological innovations, is a highly immersive, computer-generated 3D virtual space where users can interact through their avatars daily. Such an immersive environment may create numerous opportunities for retailers and enable them to advance their omnichannel strategies. However, these opportunities are difficult to determine due to considerable ambiguity and a lack of consensus on metaverse qualities and their social consequences, which may affect the usage intention and adoption. Balancing the metaverse's social, environmental, and economic goals could help determine possible ways to design it. Therefore, this study explores future metaverse scenarios, identifies values present (and missing) in these scenarios, and explores the scope of potential trade-offs in metaverse design. A real-time Delphi-based scenario study (time horizon 2040) was conducted with 15 experts. Based on experts' assessments of 21 projections, four scenarios were developed: the Metawars, the Meta Business Models, the Great Escape, and the Surveillance Metaworld. The scenarios were further qualitatively analyzed to identify their dominating and neglected values. The findings indicate that dominant values come from the market and industrial worlds. In contrast, most neglected in current thinking about the metaverse's future are the domestic, civic, and green values. The four metaverse future scenarios can serve as inputs for technology-in-use concepts and prototypes in the retail and omnichannel domains. The findings also encourage a ‘what if’ reflection on how these scenarios might change if metaverse design considers values that may not be predominant yet.
Suggested Citation
Hajdas, Monika & Radomska, Joanna & Szpulak, Aleksandra & Kawa, Arkadiusz, 2025.
"The trade-offs of metaverse value creation. Real-Time-Delphi-based scenario analysis by 2040,"
Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:teinso:v:83:y:2025:i:c:s0160791x25002180
DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103028
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:83:y:2025:i:c:s0160791x25002180. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.