IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v83y2025ics0160791x25001708.html

Strategies to overcome barriers to LCA adoption in additive manufacturing

Author

Listed:
  • Lee, Jocelyn Ke Yin
  • Gholami, Hamed
  • Salameh, Anas A.
  • Gunasekaran, Angappa

Abstract

As additive manufacturing advances within Industry 4.0, concerns over its environmental impact have motivated this study to investigate the application of life cycle assessment (LCA) in additive manufacturing operations. While LCA offers significant benefits, its adoption is hindered by multiple barriers; however, existing research lacks a thorough discussion and analysis of these challenges and effective strategies to overcome them, highlighting a critical gap in the literature. Thus, the primary objective of this study is to scrutinize strategies for overcoming key barriers to LCA adoption in additive manufacturing within developed economies. To achieve this, a multi-method approach was employed, consisting of four sequential phases incorporating a comprehensive literature review and analysis techniques—analytical hierarchy process to examine barriers and the technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution to analyze strategies in a fuzzy environment. The research findings revealed twenty-seven barriers, systematically analyzed and ranked into five main categories in descending order: support barriers, data-related barriers, resource barriers, methodology barriers, and complexity barriers. Among the seventeen set strategic solutions, ‘commitment and support from top management’ emerged as the most prominent, followed by ‘research study on LCA training and manuals’ and ‘pre-processing of information for LCA study’. Hence, the study bridges the identified research gap by providing actionable insights that empower policymakers and industry leaders to develop targeted mitigation strategies and enhance the sustainability performance of additive manufacturing operations. It can serve as an invaluable reference, as it is the first to explore this topic.

Suggested Citation

  • Lee, Jocelyn Ke Yin & Gholami, Hamed & Salameh, Anas A. & Gunasekaran, Angappa, 2025. "Strategies to overcome barriers to LCA adoption in additive manufacturing," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:83:y:2025:i:c:s0160791x25001708
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.102980
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X25001708
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.102980?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter Tarne & Marzia Traverso & Matthias Finkbeiner, 2017. "Review of Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment and Potential for Its Adoption at an Automotive Company," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-23, April.
    2. Runze Huang & Matthew E. Riddle & Diane Graziano & Sujit Das & Sachin Nimbalkar & Joe Cresko & Eric Masanet, 2017. "Environmental and Economic Implications of Distributed Additive Manufacturing: The Case of Injection Mold Tooling," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 21(S1), pages 130-143, November.
    3. Tsalidis, Georgios Archimidis & de Santo, Elena & Gallart, Jose Jorge Espí & Corberá, Joan Berzosa & Blanco, Frederic Clarens & Pesch, Udo & Korevaar, Gijsbert, 2021. "Developing social life cycle assessment based on corporate social responsibility: A chemical process industry case regarding human rights," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    4. Giuseppe Ioppolo & Stefano Cucurachi & Roberta Salomone & Giuseppe Saija & Luigi Ciraolo, 2014. "Industrial Ecology and Environmental Lean Management: Lights and Shadows," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(9), pages 1-15, September.
    5. Lassi Linnanen, 1995. "Life cycle management: Integrated approach towards corporate environmental issues," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 4(3), pages 117-127, July.
    6. Christian Spreafico & Daniele Landi, 2022. "Using Product Design Strategies to Implement Circular Economy: Differences between Students and Professional Designers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-19, January.
    7. Yoram Wind & Thomas L. Saaty, 1980. "Marketing Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(7), pages 641-658, July.
    8. Luthra, Sunil & Mangla, Sachin Kumar & Xu, Lei & Diabat, Ali, 2016. "Using AHP to evaluate barriers in adopting sustainable consumption and production initiatives in a supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 181(PB), pages 342-349.
    9. Hamed Gholami & Jocelyn Ke Yin Lee & Ahad Ali, 2023. "Big Data Analytics for Sustainable Products: A State-of-the-Art Review and Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-22, August.
    10. Sangwon Suh, 2005. "Developing a sectoral environmental database for input-output analysis: the comprehensive environmental data archive of the US," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(4), pages 449-469.
    11. Jacqueline Cramer, 1996. "Experiences With Implementing Integrated Chain Management In Dutch Industry," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(1), pages 38-47, March.
    12. Chen, Chen-Tung & Lin, Ching-Torng & Huang, Sue-Fn, 2006. "A fuzzy approach for supplier evaluation and selection in supply chain management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(2), pages 289-301, August.
    13. T.M. Tavares & G.M.D. Ganga & M. Godinho Filho & V.P. Rodrigues, 2023. "The Benefits and Barriers of Additive Manufacturing for Circular Economy: A Framework Proposal," Post-Print hal-04458223, HAL.
    14. L. Thiruvarasu Letchumanan & Hamed Gholami & Noordin Mohd Yusof & Nor Hasrul Akhmal Bin Ngadiman & Anas A. Salameh & Dalia Štreimikienė & Fausto Cavallaro, 2022. "Analyzing the Factors Enabling Green Lean Six Sigma Implementation in the Industry 4.0 Era," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-15, March.
    15. Neslihan Top & Ismail Sahin & Sachin Kumar Mangla & Muruvvet Deniz Sezer & Yigit Kazancoglu, 2023. "Towards sustainable production for transition to additive manufacturing: a case study in the manufacturing industry," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 61(13), pages 4450-4471, July.
    16. Knud Sinding, 2000. "Environmental management beyond the boundaries of the firm: definitions and constraints," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(2), pages 79-91, March.
    17. Elibal, Kerem & Özceylan, Eren, 2022. "Comparing industry 4.0 maturity models in the perspective of TQM principles using Fuzzy MCDM methods," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    18. Naghshineh, Bardia & Ribeiro, André & Jacinto, Celeste & Carvalho, Helena, 2021. "Social impacts of additive manufacturing: A stakeholder-driven framework," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    19. Emma Rex & Henrikke Baumann, 2008. "Implications of an interpretive understanding of LCA practice," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 17(7), pages 420-430, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Romy Morana & Stefan Seuring, 2011. "A Three Level Framework for Closed-Loop Supply Chain Management—Linking Society, Chain and Actor Level," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 3(4), pages 1-14, April.
    2. Rihab Khemiri & Khaoula Elbedoui-Maktouf & Bernard Grabot & Belhassen Zouari, 2017. "A fuzzy multi-criteria decision making approach for managing performance and risk in integrated procurement-production planning," Post-Print hal-01758604, HAL.
    3. Bottani, Eleonora & Rizzi, Antonio, 2008. "An adapted multi-criteria approach to suppliers and products selection--An application oriented to lead-time reduction," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(2), pages 763-781, February.
    4. Devesh Kumar & Gunjan Soni & Rohit Joshi & Vipul Jain & Amrik Sohal, 2022. "Modelling supply chain viability during COVID-19 disruption: A case of an Indian automobile manufacturing supply chain," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 1224-1240, December.
    5. Baskaran, Venkatesan & Nachiappan, Subramanian & Rahman, Shams, 2012. "Indian textile suppliers' sustainability evaluation using the grey approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(2), pages 647-658.
    6. Helene Seidel-Sterzik & Sarah McLaren & Elena Garnevska, 2018. "Effective Life Cycle Management in SMEs: Use of a Sector-Based Approach to Overcome Barriers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-22, January.
    7. Walter J. V. Vermeulen & P. J. Ras, 2006. "The challenge of greening global product chains: meeting both ends," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 14(4), pages 245-256.
    8. Movin Sequeira & Anders Adlemo & Per Hilletofth, 2023. "A hybrid fuzzy-AHP-TOPSIS model for evaluation of manufacturing relocation decisions," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 164-191, March.
    9. Wei Zhang & Qingpu Zhang, 2014. "Multi-stage evaluation and selection in the formation process of complex creative solution," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 48(5), pages 2375-2404, September.
    10. Lanndon A. Ocampo, 2019. "Applying fuzzy AHP–TOPSIS technique in identifying the content strategy of sustainable manufacturing for food production," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 21(5), pages 2225-2251, October.
    11. Ren, Jingzheng & Lützen, Marie, 2017. "Selection of sustainable alternative energy source for shipping: Multi-criteria decision making under incomplete information," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 1003-1019.
    12. Aslam, Javed & Saleem, Aqeela & Lai, Kee-hung & Kim, Yun Bae, 2025. "Critical successes factors for the adoption of additive manufacturing: Integrated impact for circular economy model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    13. Majid Azadi & Zohreh Moghaddas & Reza Farzipoor Saen, 2025. "Assessing resilience and sustainability of suppliers: an extension and application of data envelopment analytical hierarchy process," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 346(2), pages 705-750, March.
    14. Karolina Gwarda, 2022. "Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process Method to Select the Best Supplies: A Case Study of a Production Company," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 430-440.
    15. Shivam Goyal & Dixit Garg & Sunil Luthra, 2021. "Sustainable production and consumption: analysing barriers and solutions for maintaining green tomorrow by using fuzzy-AHP–fuzzy-TOPSIS hybrid framework," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(11), pages 16934-16980, November.
    16. Hashemi, Seyed Hamid & Karimi, Amir & Tavana, Madjid, 2015. "An integrated green supplier selection approach with analytic network process and improved Grey relational analysis," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 178-191.
    17. Tian Yang & Changhao Liu & Raymond P. Côté & Jinwen Ye & Weifeng Liu, 2022. "Evaluating the Barriers to Industrial Symbiosis Using a Group AHP-TOPSIS Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-30, June.
    18. Stević, Željko & Tanackov, Ilija & Vasiljević, Marko & Vesković, Slavko, 2016. "Fuzzy Multicriteria Model for Ranking Suppliers in Manufacturing Company," Proceedings of the ENTRENOVA - ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion Conference (2016), Rovinj, Croatia, in: Proceedings of the ENTRENOVA - ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion Conference, Rovinj, Croatia, 8-9 September 2016, pages 196-203, IRENET - Society for Advancing Innovation and Research in Economy, Zagreb.
    19. Tamoor Azam & Songjiang Wang & Muhammad Mohsin & Muhammad Nazam & Muhammad Hashim & Sajjad Ahmad Baig & Muhammad Zia-ur-Rehman, 2021. "Does Stakeholder Pressure Matters in Adopting Sustainable Supply Chain Initiatives? Insights from Agro-Based Processing Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-30, June.
    20. Harpreet Kaur & Surya Prakash Singh, 2019. "Flexible dynamic sustainable procurement model," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 273(1), pages 651-691, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:83:y:2025:i:c:s0160791x25001708. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.