IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v83y2025ics0160791x25001460.html

Unveiling the multifaceted concept of cognitive security: Trends, perspectives, and future challenges

Author

Listed:
  • Casino, Fran

Abstract

As a transversal concept tied to human evolution, security has increased its relevance at the same pace as development and digitisation. With the advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) and the sophistication of advanced persistent threats, the emerging paradigm of cognitive security (i.e., defined by some authors as the use of self-aware and adaptable AI with learning capabilities to detect and mitigate security threats) gains momentum. Nevertheless, cognitive security is a complex concept that requires a more granular description. In this article, we redefine cognitive security by first analysing the state of the art to derive the current state of practice and the definitions of cognitive security. Next, we expand the concept of cognitive security by analysing its multiple pillars, including learning theories, AI technologies, human–computer interactions, and the ethical and legal aspects impacting its development and implementation. The latter is crucial towards understanding cognitive security, providing insight into its potential and prerequisites towards its realisation while emphasising its multidisciplinary nature. In addition to such a description, we analyse the current challenges in three closely interconnected fields, namely cybersecurity, digital forensics, and digital investigations, to provide a taxonomy that can be used to assess the current challenges and limitations of cognitive security and understand its potential better. Finally, we propose future research directions, aiming to develop cognitive systems capable of continuous learning, adaptation, and ethical compliance in dynamic cybersecurity environments. Our findings highlight the role of cognitive computing systems in enhancing cybersecurity, discussing the integration of human cognition and AI for proactive and resilient security solutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Casino, Fran, 2025. "Unveiling the multifaceted concept of cognitive security: Trends, perspectives, and future challenges," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:83:y:2025:i:c:s0160791x25001460
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.102956
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X25001460
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.102956?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jarrahi, Mohammad Hossein, 2018. "Artificial intelligence and the future of work: Human-AI symbiosis in organizational decision making," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 61(4), pages 577-586.
    2. Raminta Pranckutė, 2021. "Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World," Publications, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-59, March.
    3. Burton, Joe, 2023. "Algorithmic extremism? The securitization of artificial intelligence (AI) and its impact on radicalism, polarization and political violence," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    4. Celeste Biever, 2023. "ChatGPT broke the Turing test — the race is on for new ways to assess AI," Nature, Nature, vol. 619(7971), pages 686-689, July.
    5. Kim, Byung-Jik & Kim, Min-Jik, 2024. "The influence of work overload on cybersecurity behavior: A moderated mediation model of psychological contract breach, burnout, and self-efficacy in AI learning such as ChatGPT," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    6. Ma, Xiaoyue & Huo, Yudi, 2023. "Are users willing to embrace ChatGPT? Exploring the factors on the acceptance of chatbots from the perspective of AIDUA framework," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    7. Frantz Rowe, 2014. "What literature review is not: diversity, boundaries and recommendations," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(3), pages 241-255, May.
    8. Al-Emran, Mostafa & Deveci, Muhammet, 2024. "Unlocking the potential of cybersecurity behavior in the metaverse: Overview, opportunities, challenges, and future research agendas," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    9. Aggarwal, Nitin & Albert, Leslie J. & Hill, Timothy R. & Rodan, Simon A., 2020. "Risk knowledge and concern as influences of purchase intention for internet of things devices," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    10. Jackson, Emerson Abraham, 2024. "The Evolution of Artificial Intelligence: A Theoretical Review of its Impact on Teaching and Learning in the Digital Age," EconStor Preprints 280893, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    11. Alsharida, Rawan A. & Al-rimy, Bander Ali Saleh & Al-Emran, Mostafa & Zainal, Anazida, 2023. "A systematic review of multi perspectives on human cybersecurity behavior," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Giustina Secundo & Claudia Spilotro & Johanna Gast & Vincenzo Corvello, 2025. "The transformative power of artificial intelligence within innovation ecosystems: a review and a conceptual framework," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 19(9), pages 2697-2728, September.
    2. Xiaoyue Lin & Tiandong Wang & Fan Sheng, 2025. "Exploring the dual effect of trust in GAI on employees’ exploitative and exploratory innovation," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-14, December.
    3. Jiang, Xinyu & Wang, Junbin & Deng, Nianqi, 2025. "Creating existential authenticity experience by combining technology capability with gamification in the metaverse: An affordance perspective," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    4. Robertson, Jeandri & Ferreira, Caitlin & Botha, Elsamari & Oosthuizen, Kim, 2024. "Game changers: A generative AI prompt protocol to enhance human-AI knowledge co-construction," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 67(5), pages 499-510.
    5. Rehman, Anisur & Behera, Rajat Kumar & Islam, Md Saiful & Elahi, Yasir Arafat & Abbasi, Faraz Ahmad & Imtiaz, Asma, 2024. "Drivers of metaverse adoption for enhancing marketing capabilities of retail SMEs," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    6. Dima Jamali & Georges Samara & Lokman I. Meho, 2024. "Determinants of research productivity and efficiency among the Arab world’s accredited business schools," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 74(4), pages 2511-2543, December.
    7. Aihua Zhu & Samah Ali Mohsen Mofreh & Sultan Salem, 2023. "The Application of Language Proficiency Scales in Education Context: A Systematic Literature Review," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, September.
    8. Khalid Ahmed Al-Ansari & Ahmet Faruk Aysan, 2021. "More than ten years of Blockchain creation: How did we use the technology and which direction is the research heading? [Plus de dix ans de création Blockchain : Comment avons-nous utilisé la technologie et dans quelle direction se dirige la recher," Working Papers hal-03343048, HAL.
    9. Qi Mu & Fabrizio Aimar, 2022. "How Are Historical Villages Changed? A Systematic Literature Review on European and Chinese Cultural Heritage Preservation Practices in Rural Areas," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-20, June.
    10. Siliang Tong & Nan Jia & Xueming Luo & Zheng Fang, 2021. "The Janus face of artificial intelligence feedback: Deployment versus disclosure effects on employee performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(9), pages 1600-1631, September.
    11. Shanyu Lin & Esra Sipahi Döngül & Serdar Vural Uygun & Mutlu Başaran Öztürk & Dinh Tran Ngoc Huy & Pham Van Tuan, 2022. "Exploring the Relationship between Abusive Management, Self-Efficacy and Organizational Performance in the Context of Human–Machine Interaction Technology and Artificial Intelligence with the Effect of Ergonomics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-22, February.
    12. Michael Vössing & Niklas Kühl & Matteo Lind & Gerhard Satzger, 2022. "Designing Transparency for Effective Human-AI Collaboration," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 877-895, June.
    13. Eduardo José Melo Lins & Rachel Perez Palha & Maria do Carmo Martins Sobral & Adolpho Guido de Araújo & Érika Alves Tavares Marques, 2024. "Application of Building Information Modelling in Construction and Demolition Waste Management: Systematic Review and Future Trends Supported by a Conceptual Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-55, October.
    14. Borba, Rafael Lucas & de Paula Ferreira, Iuri Emmanuel & Bertucci Ramos, Paulo Henrique, 2024. "Addressing discriminatory bias in artificial intelligence systems operated by companies: An analysis of end-user perspectives," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    15. Paola Alzate & Juan F. Mejía-Giraldo & Isabella Jurado & Sara Hernandez & Alexandra Novozhenina, 2024. "Research perspectives on youth social entrepreneurship: strategies, economy, and innovation," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 1-22, December.
    16. Seyi Stephen & Clinton Aigbavboa, 2025. "Enhancing Academia–Industry Partnerships for Sustainable Building: A Change Framework for Research and Innovation Integration in Sub-Saharan Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-33, April.
    17. Ghosh, Soumili & Behera, Rajat Kumar & Bala, Pradip Kumar & Rana, Nripendra P., 2025. "Adverse impacts of metaverse-induced cognitive biases on the immersive shopping experience: A conceptual model developed from a qualitative approach," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    18. Anna Małgorzata Kamińska, 2025. "Tailoring Scientific Knowledge: How Generative AI Personalizes Academic Reading Experiences," Publications, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-28, April.
    19. Galeev, A. & Galeeva, E. & Zhokhov, M., 2025. "Does theory influence policy? A quantitative analysis of interrelationship between academic discourse and economic policy in international trade," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 69(4), pages 207-231.
    20. Pedro Antonio Martín-Cervantes & Parisa Ziarati & Pablo de Frutos Madrazo & Iza Gigauri, 2025. "Digital Marketing as a Driver of Change Towards the Circular Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-24, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:83:y:2025:i:c:s0160791x25001460. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.