IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v82y2025ics0160791x25001332.html

Are virtual places perceived as real? Belief in equivalence of virtual and physical spaces and its role in shaping willingness to migrate to virtual worlds

Author

Listed:
  • Oleksy, Tomasz
  • Lassota, Izabela

Abstract

Have virtual spaces become so integrated into daily life that they are now perceived as ‘real’? Although philosophical debates have long examined the boundaries between real and virtual places, empirical studies on how people perceive these distinctions remain limited. In three cross-sectional studies conducted in the UK and Poland (Ntotal = 2360), we investigated the extent to which virtual places are perceived as equivalent to real-world locations. Our findings revealed that most adults still perceive a strong distinction between virtual and physical places, whereas adolescents reported a higher perceived equivalence. In all three studies, stronger attachment to virtual places predicted higher perceived equivalence, which in turn partially mediated the relationship between attachment and a willingness to move more activities to digital places. We argue that perceived equivalence helps explain how people redefine “place” as technology rapidly reshapes our environments.

Suggested Citation

  • Oleksy, Tomasz & Lassota, Izabela, 2025. "Are virtual places perceived as real? Belief in equivalence of virtual and physical spaces and its role in shaping willingness to migrate to virtual worlds," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:82:y:2025:i:c:s0160791x25001332
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.102943
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X25001332
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.102943?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:plo:pone00:0068967 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Jean Twenge & David G. Blanchflower, 2025. "Declining Life Satisfaction and Happiness Among Young Adults in Six English-speaking Countries," NBER Working Papers 33490, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. repec:nas:journl:v:115:y:2018:p:9216-9221 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Elimelech, Ortal Cohen & Ferrante, Simona & Josman, Naomi & Meyer, Sonya & Lunardini, Francesca & Gómez-Raja, Jonathan & Galán, Carmen & Cáceres, Pilar & Sciama, Piera & Gros, Marianne & Vurro, Clodia, 2022. "Technology use characteristics among older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-cultural survey," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    5. Amy Orben & Sarah-Jayne Blakemore, 2023. "How social media affects teen mental health: a missing link," Nature, Nature, vol. 614(7948), pages 410-412, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Teichmann, Fabian & Boticiu, Sonia & Sergi, Bruno S., 2023. "RegTech – Potential benefits and challenges for businesses," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    2. Yuen, Kum Fai & Ng, Wei Hong & Wang, Xueqin, 2023. "Switching intention in the online crowdsourced delivery environment: The influence of a platform's technological characteristics and relational bonding strategies," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    3. Eric Edmonds & Priya Mukherjee & Nikhilesh Prakash & Nishith Prakash & Shwetlena Sabarwal, 2025. "Talk Therapy and Human Capital in Adolescence: Evidence from a Low-Resource Setting," CESifo Working Paper Series 11888, CESifo.
    4. Jianwen Yan & Siwei Zhang & Siqi Zhang, 2023. "Emotional Attachment in Social E-Commerce: The Role of Social Capital and Peer Influence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-14, March.
    5. Park, Hyeyoung K. & Chung, Joohyun & Ha, Jiyeon, 2023. "Acceptance of technology related to healthcare among older Korean adults in rural areas: A mixed-method study," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    6. Alexey Makarin & Simona Mandile, 2025. "Social Media and Mental Health: The Role of Algorithms and Regulation," EconPol Forum, CESifo, vol. 26(04), pages 63-67, October.
    7. Esmaeilzadeh, Pouyan & Maddah, Mahed, 2024. "Robotic companions and healthy aging: A mixed-methods exploration of older adults' perspectives and insights," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    8. Pinheiro Amâncio, Fernanda Maria & Souza, Ana Paula & Fantinato, Marcelo & Peres, Sarajane Marques & Hung, Patrick C.K. & Coutinho do Rêgo, Luis Gustavo & Roa, Jorge, 2023. "Parental perception of children's privacy in smart toys in countries of different economic levels," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    9. Mader, Sebastian & Costantini, Damiano & Fahr, Annette & Jordan, Marina Delgrande, 2025. "The effect of social media use on adolescents’ subjective well-being: Longitudinal evidence from Switzerland," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 365(C).
    10. Aly, Heba & Liu, Yizhou & Khan, Sushmita & Anaraky, Reza Ghaiumy & Byrne, Kaileigh & Knijnenburg, Bart, 2025. "Digital privacy education: Customized interventions for U.S. older and younger adults in rural and urban settings," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:82:y:2025:i:c:s0160791x25001332. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.