IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v82y2025ics0160791x25000909.html

Can ex ante conformity assessment regulations contribute to trustworthy foundation models? An evolutionary game analysis from an innovation ecosystem perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Xiaoxu
  • Zhou, Wenyong
  • Hu, Wen
  • Zhou, Shenghan
  • Hu, Xiaoqian
  • Yang, Linchao

Abstract

Untrustworthy artificial intelligence (AI) systems, especially foundation models, may lead to significant economic and social issues, and this has been arousing widespread concern. However, there is no mature and future-proofed regulatory approach to govern foundation models or any consensus regarding the regulations due to their rapid development and limited understanding of them. Thus, the potential of alternative regulation methods should be fully discussed. The ex ante conformity assessment in the EU AI Act, the world's first comprehensive AI law, is applied to regulate high-risk AI systems and can be an alternative regulatory approach to manage foundation models in the future. Consequently, this necessitates considering whether ex ante conformity assessment can contribute to achieving trustworthy foundation models. Hence, we adopted an innovation ecosystem perspective and employed an evolutionary game approach, constructing two hypothetical scenarios for ex ante conformity assessment, namely, self-assessment and independent assessment. Findings show that market forces and ecosystem impacts play a crucial role in shaping trustworthiness and that ex ante conformity assessment alone—whether through self-assessment or independent assessment—may be insufficient to ensure trustworthy outcomes. Thus, we argue that market-driven incentives and ecosystem thinking among industry practitioners are pivotal for advancing trustworthy foundation models; however, it is important to remain cautious about the limitations of market mechanisms. Therefore, a hybrid regulatory framework that combines legal mandates with market-based incentives and ecosystem influences warrants further exploration. Furthermore, independent evaluators can serve as important facilitators in supporting providers through trustworthy audits. This study contributes to on-going policy discussions on trustworthy AI regulation and offers references for future policy design and implementation.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Xiaoxu & Zhou, Wenyong & Hu, Wen & Zhou, Shenghan & Hu, Xiaoqian & Yang, Linchao, 2025. "Can ex ante conformity assessment regulations contribute to trustworthy foundation models? An evolutionary game analysis from an innovation ecosystem perspective," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:82:y:2025:i:c:s0160791x25000909
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.102900
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X25000909
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.102900?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Grzegorz Mazurek & Karolina Małagocka, 2019. "Perception of privacy and data protection in the context of the development of artificial intelligence," Journal of Management Analytics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(4), pages 344-364, October.
    2. Han, The Anh & Lenaerts, Tom & Santos, Francisco C. & Pereira, Luís Moniz, 2022. "Voluntary safety commitments provide an escape from over-regulation in AI development," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    3. Nanyi Fei & Zhiwu Lu & Yizhao Gao & Guoxing Yang & Yuqi Huo & Jingyuan Wen & Haoyu Lu & Ruihua Song & Xin Gao & Tao Xiang & Hao Sun & Ji-Rong Wen, 2022. "Towards artificial general intelligence via a multimodal foundation model," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    4. STAHL, Bernd Carsten, 2022. "Responsible innovation ecosystems: Ethical implications of the application of the ecosystem concept to artificial intelligence," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    5. The Anh Han & Luís Moniz Pereira & Tom Lenaerts & Francisco C Santos, 2021. "Mediating artificial intelligence developments through negative and positive incentives," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(1), pages 1-21, January.
    6. Hannigan, Timothy R. & Briggs, Anthony R. & Valadao, Rodrigo & Seidel, Marc-David L. & Jennings, P. Devereaux, 2022. "A new tool for policymakers: Mapping cultural possibilities in an emerging AI entrepreneurial ecosystem," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(9).
    7. Scott Thiebes & Sebastian Lins & Ali Sunyaev, 2021. "Trustworthy artificial intelligence," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 31(2), pages 447-464, June.
    8. Encarnação, Sara & Santos, Fernando P. & Santos, Francisco C. & Blass, Vered & Pacheco, Jorge M. & Portugali, Juval, 2018. "Paths to the adoption of electric vehicles: An evolutionary game theoretical approach," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 24-33.
    9. Michael G. Jacobides & Carmelo Cennamo & Annabelle Gawer, 2018. "Towards a theory of ecosystems," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(8), pages 2255-2276, August.
    10. Nathalie de Marcellis-Warin & Frédéric Marty & Eva Thelisson & Thierry Warin, 2022. "Artificial intelligence and consumer manipulations: from consumer's counter algorithms to firm's self-regulation tools," Post-Print halshs-03921216, HAL.
    11. Friedman, Daniel, 1991. "Evolutionary Games in Economics," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 59(3), pages 637-666, May.
    12. Arenal, Alberto & Armuña, Cristina & Feijoo, Claudio & Ramos, Sergio & Xu, Zimu & Moreno, Ana, 2020. "Innovation ecosystems theory revisited: The case of artificial intelligence in China," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(6).
    13. Gomes, Leonardo Augusto de Vasconcelos & Facin, Ana Lucia Figueiredo & Salerno, Mario Sergio & Ikenami, Rodrigo Kazuo, 2018. "Unpacking the innovation ecosystem construct: Evolution, gaps and trends," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 30-48.
    14. Dedehayir, Ozgur & Mäkinen, Saku J. & Roland Ortt, J., 2018. "Roles during innovation ecosystem genesis: A literature review," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 18-29.
    15. Ji, Shou-feng & Zhao, Dan & Luo, Rong-juan, 2019. "Evolutionary game analysis on local governments and manufacturers' behavioral strategies: Impact of phasing out subsidies for new energy vehicles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    16. Paolo Bova & Alessandro Di Stefano & The Anh Han, 2023. "Both eyes open: Vigilant Incentives help Regulatory Markets improve AI Safety," Papers 2303.03174, arXiv.org.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arenal, Alberto & Armuña, Cristina & Feijoo, Claudio & Ramos, Sergio & Xu, Zimu & Moreno, Ana, 2020. "Innovation ecosystems theory revisited: The case of artificial intelligence in China," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(6).
    2. Gomes, Leonardo Augusto de Vasconcelos & Flechas, Ximena Alejandra & Facin, Ana Lucia Figueiredo & Borini, Felipe Mendes, 2021. "Ecosystem management: Past achievements and future promises," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    3. Liu, Gordon & Aroean, Lukman & Ko, Wai Wai, 2023. "Service innovation in business ecosystem: The roles of shared goals, coopetition, and interfirm power," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    4. Gomes, Leonardo Augusto de Vasconcelos & Fleury, André Leme & Oliveira, Maicon Gouvêa de & Facin, Ana Lucia Figueiredo, 2021. "Ecosystem policy roadmapping," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    5. Tan, Bing Qing & Kang, Kai & Zhong, Ray Y., 2023. "Electric vehicle charging infrastructure investment strategy analysis: State-owned versus private parking lots," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 54-71.
    6. Nylund, Petra A. & Amores-Bravo, Xavier & Ferràs-Hernández, Xavier & Brem, Alexander, 2023. "Crisis as a catalyst of idle innovation ecosystems: Evidence from ecosystem exaptation of a water partnership," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    7. Pushpananthan, Gouthanan & Elmquist, Maria, 2022. "Joining forces to create value: The emergence of an innovation ecosystem," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    8. Okpalaoka, Chijindu Iheanacho, 2023. "Research on the digital economy: Developing trends and future directions," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    9. Pouru-Mikkola, Laura & Minkkinen, Matti & Malho, Maria & Neuvonen, Aleksi, 2023. "Exploring knowledge creation, capabilities, and relations in a distributed policy foresight system: Case Finland," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 186(PB).
    10. Burström, Thommie & Lahti, Tom & Parida, Vinit & Wincent, Joakim, 2024. "Industrial ecosystems: A systematic review, framework and research agenda," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    11. Li, Junqiang & Ren, Hao & Wang, Mingyue, 2021. "How to escape the dilemma of charging infrastructure construction? A multi-sectorial stochastic evolutionary game model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    12. Ng, Wilson & Arndt, Félix & Huang, Tori Y., 2020. "Do-It-yourself laboratories as integration-based ecosystems✰," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    13. Roshani, Saeed, 2025. "Dynamic roles and temporal evolution in innovation ecosystems: A case study of quantum technologies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    14. Lijie Feng & Jiarui Lu & Jinfeng Wang, 2021. "A Systematic Review of Enterprise Innovation Ecosystems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-26, May.
    15. Cobben, Dieudonnee & Ooms, Ward & Roijakkers, Nadine & Radziwon, Agnieszka, 2022. "Ecosystem types: A systematic review on boundaries and goals," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 138-164.
    16. Chen Qu & Eunyoung Kim, 2025. "Artificial-Intelligence-Enabled Innovation Ecosystems: A Novel Triple-Layer Framework for Micro, Small, and Medium-Sized Enterprises in the Chinese Apparel-Manufacturing Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-24, May.
    17. Kai Li & Lulu Xia & Nenggui Zhao & Hong Fu, 2023. "Evolutionary game analysis on incremental component suppliers and auto manufacturers' intelligent connected vehicle production decisions," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(5), pages 2907-2923, July.
    18. Dedehayir, Ozgur & Mäkinen, Saku J. & Ortt, J. Roland, 2022. "Innovation ecosystems as structures: Actor roles, timing of their entrance, and interactions," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    19. Wang, Haonan & Lee, C.K.M. & Ji, Ping & Zhao, Zhonghao, 2025. "Electric bus transition with leasing companies: An evolutionary game theory approach," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    20. Hao, Xinyu & Liu, Guangfu & Zhang, Xiaoling & Dong, Liang, 2022. "The coevolution mechanism of stakeholder strategies in the recycled resources industry innovation ecosystem: the view of evolutionary game theory," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:82:y:2025:i:c:s0160791x25000909. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.