Author
Listed:
- Loewe, Martha
- Ott, Ingrid
Abstract
Both, robotics/AI (RAI) and real-world labs (RWLs), are current topics in public innovation promotion policies, but are mostly treated in isolation. While RAI has a focus on a specific technology to serve society, RWLs address the institutional context including experimental learning of governments and societal perspectives. We are particularly interested in the interface between RAI and RWLs and the way media are reporting on these two domains. This reflects key aspects of the social debate in relation to RAI and RWLs. We base our analysis on the understanding that technology development and diffusion ultimately depend on institutional arrangements that are developed alongside or in lieu of market arrangements and also reflect societal needs. This paper uses quantitative text analysis to examine 3,800 German broadsheet newspaper articles in the period 2016–2023. We use Structural Topic Modeling (STM) with publication date and sub-corpus source as covariates to trace topic dynamics and topical prevalence contrast. We show that the dominant topic has changed over time from RAI (“Machine Learning and AI Development Methods”) to RWL (“Real-World Labs for the Energy Transition”). We identify bridge topics and argue that these are diverse and include philosophical and legal considerations, public funding and specific application areas for robots, e.g. in schools. As indicators to identify the interface between the two domains (RAI, RWL), we propose a combination of topical prevalence contrast and eigenvector centrality and the use of psycholinguistic attributes to evaluate the topics. These elements could be broadly used to exploit possible complementarities for government experimental learning and when designing “smart regulation” which targets several fields simultaneously.
Suggested Citation
Loewe, Martha & Ott, Ingrid, 2025.
"Bridging robotics/AI and real-world labs: A quantitative approach based on mining German newspaper articles,"
Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:teinso:v:82:y:2025:i:c:s0160791x25000879
DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.102897
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:82:y:2025:i:c:s0160791x25000879. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.