IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v82y2025ics0160791x25000715.html

Mitigating social polarization in video sharing platform using unbiased recommendation system: A case study of South Korea political youtube channels

Author

Listed:
  • Tran, Giang T.C.
  • Jung, Jason J.
  • Han, Jeonghun

Abstract

In a digital age marked by surging polarization and the rise of echo chambers on video-sharing platforms, the imperative for unbiased, diverse content recommendation systems has never been more apparent. This study aims to propose a novel approach for building an unbiased recommendation system on a video-sharing platform to address the issue of escalating polarization and biased content. Our novel system targets the heart of social polarization, aiming to provide users with balanced exposure to a spectrum of perspectives on contentious issues. By integrating advanced techniques for polarity measurement, harnessing user activity, and leveraging video characteristics, we have constructed an innovative unbiased recommendation system. Commencing with seed channels, we collect sample data to establish user activity models and gauge the bias of each channel. The comprehensive feature set we utilize includes video titles, hashtags, posting times, comment distribution, and active users, each meticulously embedded to ensure the utmost precision in addressing user preferences. The output of the model is designed to provide users seeking relevant videos for social events without polarization bias. We use political polarization as a representative case, amassing data from Korean Political YouTube channels via our TubePlunger system. Beginning with six seed channels and approximately one million users, we analyzed more than six million comments on 24,000 videos to create an expansive dataset, eventually encompassing over 50 other relevant channels. More than 80% of survey participants agree that our system offers a means to achieve information balance across the political spectrum, in contrast to YouTube recommendations. They view TubePlunger as a valuable solution for addressing media-related social polarization issues. This proposed recommendation system approach has the potential to encourage a more equitable and informed political discourse, curbing polarization and enhancing democratic engagement in the online realm. This research signifies a pivotal stride in the realm of unbiased recommendation systems, transcending politics to extend its influence across diverse fields, providing balanced perspectives and bridging divides in a polarized digital world.

Suggested Citation

  • Tran, Giang T.C. & Jung, Jason J. & Han, Jeonghun, 2025. "Mitigating social polarization in video sharing platform using unbiased recommendation system: A case study of South Korea political youtube channels," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:82:y:2025:i:c:s0160791x25000715
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.102881
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X25000715
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.102881?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michele Avalle & Niccolò Marco & Gabriele Etta & Emanuele Sangiorgio & Shayan Alipour & Anita Bonetti & Lorenzo Alvisi & Antonio Scala & Andrea Baronchelli & Matteo Cinelli & Walter Quattrociocchi, 2024. "Persistent interaction patterns across social media platforms and over time," Nature, Nature, vol. 628(8008), pages 582-589, April.
    2. Behera, Rajat Kumar & Gunasekaran, Angappa & Gupta, Shivam & Kamboj, Shampy & Bala, Pradip Kumar, 2020. "Personalized digital marketing recommender engine," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    3. Christopher K. Tokita & Andrew M. Guess & Corina E. Tarnita, 2021. "Polarized information ecosystems can reorganize social networks via information cascades," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 118(50), pages 2102147118-, December.
    4. Giang T. C. Tran & Luong Vuong Nguyen & Jason J. Jung & Jeonghun Han, 2022. "Understanding Political Polarization Based on User Activity: A Case Study in Korean Political YouTube Channels," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, April.
    5. Zuiderveen Borgesius, Frederik J. & Trilling, Damian & Möller, Judith & Bodó, Balázs & de Vreese, Claes H. & Helberger, Natali, 2016. "Should we worry about filter bubbles?," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 5(1), pages 1-16.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guohui Song & Yongbin Wang, 2021. "Mainstream Value Information Push Strategy on Chinese Aggregation News Platform: Evolution, Modelling and Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-17, October.
    2. Yi Ding & Haifeng Xu & Chee Wei Phang & Bernard C. Y. Tan, 2025. "Understanding consumers’ online browsing patterns and influence of marketing stimuli: A two-layer sequence analysis approach," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 53(6), pages 1715-1747, December.
    3. Ramazan Esmeli & Mohamed Bader-El-Den & Hassana Abdullahi, 2021. "Towards early purchase intention prediction in online session based retailing systems," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 31(3), pages 697-715, September.
    4. DeMora, Stephanie L. & Granados Samayoa, Javier A. & Albarracín, Dolores, 2024. "Social media use and vaccination among Democrats and Republicans: Informational and normative influences," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 352(C).
    5. Zhang, Zhiwei & Liu, Gao & Chen, Bin & Huang, Kun, 2022. "Social asset or social liability? How partisanship moderates the relationship between social capital and Covid-19 vaccination rates across United States counties," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 311(C).
    6. Lambillotte, Laetitia & Magrofuoco, Nathan & Poncin, Ingrid & Vanderdonckt, Jean, 2022. "Enhancing playful customer experience with personalization," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    7. Herzog, Bodo, 2019. "Optimal policy under uncertainty and rational inattention," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 444-449.
    8. Thomas E. Powell & Toni G. L. A. van der Meer & Carlos Brenes Peralta, 2019. "Picture Power? The Contribution of Visuals and Text to Partisan Selective Exposure," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(3), pages 12-31.
    9. Pratyush Arya & Nisheeth Srivastava, 2025. "Characterizing the roles of preference homophily and network structure on outcomes of consensus games," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 31(2), pages 139-160, June.
    10. Kris Hartley & Minh Khuong Vu, 2020. "Fighting fake news in the COVID-19 era: policy insights from an equilibrium model," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 53(4), pages 735-758, December.
    11. König Pascal D., 2020. "Why Digital-Era Political Marketing is Not the Death Knell for Democracy: On the Importance of Placing Political Microtargeting in the Context of Party Competition," Statistics, Politics and Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 11(1), pages 87-110, June.
    12. Luo, Huan-Chen & Wang, Hong-jue & Hu, Zhao-Long & Yang, Kai & Hou, Lei & Huang, Yi-Zhen, 2026. "Federated learning-based regularized adversarial graph embedding for cross-social network user alignment," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 202(P1).
    13. Pelletier, Mark J. & Horky, Alisha Blakeney & Fox, Alexa K., 2021. "Fexit: The effect of political and promotional communication from friends and family on Facebook exiting intentions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 321-334.
    14. Evan F. Kuehn, 2023. "The information ecosystem concept in information literacy: A theoretical approach and definition," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 74(4), pages 434-443, April.
    15. Heredero, Laura Carmen & Camarero, Carmen & Rodríguez-Escudero, Ana Isabel, 2025. "Walking on the tightrope: Unveiling the addictive power of hedonic motivations and marketing stimuli," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    16. Zhang, Congli & Wang, Xiaolei & Min, Yong & Yu, Shanqing & Wu, Ye & Xuan, Qi & Fu, Chenbo, 2025. "Polarization in social media," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 665(C).
    17. Andrea Nasuto & Francisco Rowe, 2024. "Understanding anti-immigration sentiment spreading on Twitter," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(9), pages 1-21, September.
    18. Koguchi, Teppei & Jitsuzumi, Toshiya, 2024. "An international comparative analysis of the acceptability of the concept of "information health"," 24th ITS Biennial Conference, Seoul 2024. New bottles for new wine: digital transformation demands new policies and strategies 302508, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    19. Anna Gerbrandy, 2019. "Rethinking Competition Law within the European Economic Constitution," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(1), pages 127-142, January.
    20. Qiwei Han & Carolina Lucas & Emila Aguiar & Patrícia Macedo & Zhenze Wu, 2023. "Towards privacy-preserving digital marketing: an integrated framework for user modeling using deep learning on a data monetization platform," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 1701-1730, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:82:y:2025:i:c:s0160791x25000715. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.