IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v73y2023ics0160791x23000611.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Technologies of antiblackness: Black matter, racial bias, and the haunting past of the spirometer

Author

Listed:
  • Barla, Josef

Abstract

This article utilizes the case of the spirometer, a medical instrument used to measure vital lung capacity, to tender an expansive argument on the entangled history of antiblackness and technology. It mobilizes the notion of the “apparatus of bodily production” to show how the spirometer produces knowledge about the bodies it measures while also enacting racialized Black bodies as allegedly flawed matter. The article demonstrates that such construal points us to the antiblack past of the instrument, which continues to haunt Black bodies and lives in the present. Moreover, the article evinces that race does not refer in such a framework to something that can be found in bodies, whether in the sense of a purported biological truth that resides inside bodies or as a sociocultural inscription on the surface of bodies. Instead, race emerges as a relational phenomenon, an effect of historical materialization that traverses some bodies and not others. Thus, the article demonstrates that recent demands for less biased technologies such as spirometers in medicine and other domains run the risk of evoking the idea that technology can be neutral or that measurements can be objective.

Suggested Citation

  • Barla, Josef, 2023. "Technologies of antiblackness: Black matter, racial bias, and the haunting past of the spirometer," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:73:y:2023:i:c:s0160791x23000611
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102256
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X23000611
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102256?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:73:y:2023:i:c:s0160791x23000611. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.