IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/techno/v154y2026ics0166497226000830.html

Artificial intelligence in trauma and emergency surgery: A quantitative study of perceived technology acceptance

Author

Listed:
  • Dal Mas, Francesca
  • Massaro, Maurizio
  • Fijałkowska, Justyna
  • Ndou, Valentina
  • Raguseo, Elisabetta

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is a transformative technology capable of driving the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) implementation across various industries. It can play a crucial role in the healthcare sector, especially in highly specialized fields such as trauma and emergency surgery, where its potential to assist in clinical decision-making is gaining widespread recognition. When appropriately designed and governed, AI applications in surgery can contribute to SDG 3 by improving health outcomes and promoting well-being. Moreover, clearly defined accountability and responsibility frameworks for AI in healthcare support SDG 16 by enabling auditability, clarifying responsibility allocation, and fostering institutional trust through transparent governance mechanisms. Despite these opportunities, ethical and governance-related concerns remain central to AI adoption and significantly shape the attitudes of medical professionals, patients, technology providers, developers, and policymakers. This exploratory study investigates surgeons' perceptions regarding AI adoption through a framework informed by the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT). While grounded in UTAUT, the study incorporates context-specific constructs that capture the unique challenges of surgical practice: performance expectancy, perceived diagnostic complexity, patient-centered communication orientation, responsible AI governance climate, and shared accountability perceptions. By examining how responsibility interacts with traditional UTAUT constructs, performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, and facilitating conditions, this research offers a more context-sensitive understanding of AI adoption in high-stakes medical environments. Through a comprehensive survey endorsed by the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES), involving 624 physicians from 72 countries, we aim to highlight these concerns and propose a conceptual model that reconciles AI's technological advances with the ethical obligations to protect patients and ensure sustainable healthcare outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Dal Mas, Francesca & Massaro, Maurizio & Fijałkowska, Justyna & Ndou, Valentina & Raguseo, Elisabetta, 2026. "Artificial intelligence in trauma and emergency surgery: A quantitative study of perceived technology acceptance," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:techno:v:154:y:2026:i:c:s0166497226000830
    DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2026.103548
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166497226000830
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.technovation.2026.103548?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:techno:v:154:y:2026:i:c:s0166497226000830. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/01664972 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.