IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/techno/v151y2026ics0166497225002962.html

Initial opportunity selection for deep technologies: Deep Technology Opportunity Navigator (DTON)

Author

Listed:
  • Myers, Alexander
  • Albats, Ekaterina
  • Kozlova, Mariia
  • Yeomans, Julian

Abstract

Deep technology ventures (DTVs) are new firms that aim to commercialize fundamental scientific or engineering breakthroughs and are usually located in the high-cost economies that fund such research. Deep technologies can potentially provide value to many industries or sectors but doing so requires making significant investments amid uncertainty. That situation complicates DTVs’ choice of the opportunity to focus on. We employed an iterative design science approach to develop a practical tool that can help DTVs navigate that complex decision. In doing so, we first reviewed the innovation management literature to identify the important factors in opportunity selection by a DTV. We subsequently interviewed a panel of deep technology entrepreneurship experts to supplement that information. These factors were translated into tool requirements. We analyzed existing opportunity selection tools against these requirements, finding only partial support for the DTV context. The same requirements were used to build an add-on to the widely used market opportunity navigator (MON) tool specifically to inform decision-making in DTVs. We label that advancement the deep technology opportunity navigator (DTON). The DTON was deployed as part of a facilitated workshop with two DTVs to collect feedback and iterate the design of the workshop and tool. The results of those workshops are supplemented by a thought experiment to imagine how it could help DTVs, providing illustrative examples of the potential impact of the new tool. The resulting DTON design is a practical tool that DTVs and other stakeholders can use to guide strategic decision-making, and its validation contributes to the literature on science-based entrepreneurship and opportunity selection.

Suggested Citation

  • Myers, Alexander & Albats, Ekaterina & Kozlova, Mariia & Yeomans, Julian, 2026. "Initial opportunity selection for deep technologies: Deep Technology Opportunity Navigator (DTON)," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:techno:v:151:y:2026:i:c:s0166497225002962
    DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2025.103464
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166497225002962
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.technovation.2025.103464?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vohora, Ajay & Wright, Mike & Lockett, Andy, 2004. "Critical junctures in the development of university high-tech spinout companies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 147-175, January.
    2. Andries, Petra & Clarysse, Bart & Costa, Sergio, 2021. "Technology ventures' engagement of external actors in the search for viable market applications: On the relevance of Technology Broadcasting and Systematic Validation," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 36(6).
    3. Jacqueline Kirtley & Siobhan O'Mahony, 2023. "What is a pivot? Explaining when and how entrepreneurial firms decide to make strategic change and pivot," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(1), pages 197-230, January.
    4. A. Georges L. Romme & John Bell & Guus Frericks, 2023. "Designing a deep-tech venture builder to address grand challenges and overcome the valley of death," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 12(4), pages 217-237, December.
    5. Prettner, Klaus & Werner, Katharina, 2016. "Why it pays off to pay us well: The impact of basic research on economic growth and welfare," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(5), pages 1075-1090.
    6. Giovanna Magnani & Antonella Zucchella, 2018. "Uncertainty in Entrepreneurship and Management Studies: A Systematic Literature Review," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(3), pages 1-98, February.
    7. Scaringella, Laurent & Miles, Raymond E. & Truong, Yann, 2017. "Customers involvement and firm absorptive capacity in radical innovation: The case of technological spin-offs," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 144-162.
    8. Orestis Terzidis & Leonid Vogel, 2018. "A Unified Model of the Technology Push Process and Its Application in a Workshop Setting," FGF Studies in Small Business and Entrepreneurship, in: André Presse & Orestis Terzidis (ed.), Technology Entrepreneurship, pages 111-135, Springer.
    9. Laurent Scaringella & Raymond Miles & Yann Truong, 2017. "Customers involvement and firm absorptive capacity in radical innovation: The case of technological spin-offs," Post-Print hal-02003319, HAL.
    10. Marc Gruber & Ian C. MacMillan & James D. Thompson, 2008. "Look Before You Leap: Market Opportunity Identification in Emerging Technology Firms," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(9), pages 1652-1665, September.
    11. Ebrahimi, Bahman P., 2000. "Perceived Strategic Uncertainty and Environmental Scanning Behavior of Hong Kong Chinese Executives," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 67-77, July.
    12. Gregory Theyel & Nelli Theyel & Elizabeth Garnsey, 2013. "Matching resources to opportunities for emerging technology ventures," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 36(10), pages 1011-1023, September.
    13. Benjamin E. Hermalin and Alice M. Isen., 1999. "The Effect of Affect on Economic and Strategic Decision Making," Economics Working Papers E99-270, University of California at Berkeley.
    14. Burnell, Devin & Stevenson, Regan & Fisher, Greg, 2023. "Early-stage business model experimentation and pivoting," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 38(4).
    15. Maine, Elicia & Garnsey, Elizabeth, 2006. "Commercializing generic technology: The case of advanced materials ventures," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 375-393, April.
    16. Gregory Theyel & Nelli Theyel & Elizabeth Garnsey, 2013. "Matching resources to opportunities for emerging technology ventures," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 36(10), pages 1011-1023, September.
    17. Mcmullen, Jeffery S., 2015. "Entrepreneurial judgment as empathic accuracy: a sequential decision-making approach to entrepreneurial action," Journal of Institutional Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 11(3), pages 651-681, September.
    18. Thomas, V.J. & Bliemel, Martin & Shippam, Cynthia & Maine, Elicia, 2020. "Endowing university spin-offs pre-formation: Entrepreneurial capabilities for scientist-entrepreneurs," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 96.
    19. Arora, Ashish & Fosfuri, Andrea & Rønde, Thomas, 2024. "The missing middle: Value capture in the market for startups," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(3).
    20. Greg Fisher, 2012. "Effectuation, Causation, and Bricolage: A Behavioral Comparison of Emerging Theories in Entrepreneurship Research," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 36(5), pages 1019-1051, September.
    21. Gersbach, Hans & Schetter, Ulrich & Schmassmann, Samuel, 2023. "From local to global: A theory of public basic research in a globalized world," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    22. Akter, Shahriar & Hossain, Md Afnan & Sajib, Shahriar & Sultana, Saida & Rahman, Mahfuzur & Vrontis, Demetris & McCarthy, Grace, 2023. "A framework for AI-powered service innovation capability: Review and agenda for future research," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    23. Motohashi, Kazuyuki & Zhu, Chen, 2023. "Identifying technology opportunity using dual-attention model and technology-market concordance matrix," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    24. Nicolai J. Foss & Peter G. Klein & Christian Bjørnskov, 2019. "The Context of Entrepreneurial Judgment: Organizations, Markets, and Institutions," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(6), pages 1197-1213, September.
    25. Parolin, Giácomo & McAloone, Tim C. & Pigosso, Daniela C.A., 2024. "How can technology assessment tools support sustainable innovation? A systematic literature review and synthesis," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    26. Haessler, Philipp & Giones, Ferran & Brem, Alexander, 2023. "The who and how of commercializing emerging technologies: A technology-focused review," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    27. Gary P. Pisano, 2010. "The evolution of science-based business: innovating how we innovate," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 19(2), pages 465-482, April.
    28. Rahul Kapoor & Thomas Klueter, 2021. "Unbundling and Managing Uncertainty Surrounding Emerging Technologies," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 6(1), pages 62-74, March.
    29. Dalton Garcia Borges de Souza & Erivelton Antonio dos Santos & Nei Yoshihiro Soma & Carlos Eduardo Sanches da Silva, 2021. "MCDM-Based R&D Project Selection: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-34, October.
    30. Edward T. Jackson, 2013. "Interrogating the theory of change: evaluating impact investing where it matters most," Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(2), pages 95-110, April.
    31. Fini, Riccardo & Perkmann, Markus & Kenney, Martin & Maki, Kanetaka M., 2023. "Are public subsidies effective for university spinoffs? Evidence from SBIR awards in the University of California system," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(1).
    32. Gregory Theyel & Nelli Theyel & Elizabeth Garnsey, 2013. "Matching resources to opportunities for emerging technology ventures," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 36(10), pages 1011-1023, September.
    33. Zornitsa B. Yordanova, 2018. "Lean Startup Method Hampers Breakthrough Innovations and Company's Innovativeness," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(02), pages 1-18, April.
    34. Alan D. Meyer & Kathryn Aten & Alan J. Krause & Matthew L. Metzger & Samuel S. Holloway, 2011. "Creating a university technology commercialisation programme: confronting conflicts between learning, discovery and commercialisation goals," International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 13(2), pages 179-198.
    35. Clarysse, Bart & Moray, Nathalie, 2004. "A process study of entrepreneurial team formation: the case of a research-based spin-off," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 55-79, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Devin Burnell & Greg Fisher & Regan Stevenson & Donald F. Kuratko, 2026. "Entrepreneurial Experimentation: Conceptual Foundations, Integrative Theoretical Framework, and Research Agenda," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 50(1), pages 275-312, January.
    2. Thomas, V.J. & Bliemel, Martin & Shippam, Cynthia & Maine, Elicia, 2020. "Endowing university spin-offs pre-formation: Entrepreneurial capabilities for scientist-entrepreneurs," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 96.
    3. Haessler, Philipp & Giones, Ferran & Brem, Alexander, 2023. "The who and how of commercializing emerging technologies: A technology-focused review," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    4. Marius Tuft Mathisen & Einar Rasmussen, 2019. "The development, growth, and performance of university spin-offs: a critical review," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 44(6), pages 1891-1938, December.
    5. Denoo, Lien & Soh, Pek Hooi & Clarysse, Bart, 2026. "From strong ties to no ties: Configurations for first-customer acquisition in tech startups," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 41(2).
    6. Messina, Lisa & Miller, Kristel & Galbraith, Brendan & Hewitt-Dundas, Nola, 2022. "A recipe for USO success? Unravelling the micro-foundations of dynamic capability building to overcome critical junctures," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    7. Burnell, Devin & Stevenson, Regan & Fisher, Greg, 2023. "Early-stage business model experimentation and pivoting," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 38(4).
    8. Bahuleyan, Athira & Chavan, Meena & Krzeminska, Anna & Chirico, Francesco, 2024. "Process and variance research: Integrating research on university spinoff evolution," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    9. Rasmussen, Einar & Mosey, Simon & Wright, Mike, 2014. "The influence of university departments on the evolution of entrepreneurial competencies in spin-off ventures," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 92-106.
    10. Einar Rasmussen & Paul Benneworth & Magnus Gulbrandsen, 2013. "Scoping paper: Developing University Innovation Capacity: How can innovation policy effectively harness universities’ capability to promote high-growth technology businesses?," Working Papers on Innovation Studies 20131007, Centre for Technology, Innovation and Culture, University of Oslo.
    11. Weissenböck, Eva & Breugst, Nicola & Brattström, Anna, 2025. "Coordination, sensemaking, and idea work: How founding teams pivot their venture ideas," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 40(2).
    12. Argyro Iro Nikiforou & Lars Alkærsig & Irini Voudouris & Jes Broeng, 2026. "Recognizing the need for a non-academic cofounder: competence (mis)perceptions in academic spin-off team formation," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 66(3), pages 1117-1139, March.
    13. Schmidt, Arne & Walter, Sascha G. & Walter, Achim, 2010. "Contingency Factors and the Technology-Performance-Relationship in Start-ups," EconStor Preprints 37082, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    14. Uwe Cantner & Philip Doerr & Maximilian Goethner & Matthias Huegel & Martin Kalthaus, 2024. "A procedural perspective on academic spin-off creation: the changing relative importance of the academic and the commercial sphere," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 62(4), pages 1555-1590, April.
    15. Einar Rasmussen & Mike Wright, 2015. "How can universities facilitate academic spin-offs? An entrepreneurial competency perspective," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 40(5), pages 782-799, October.
    16. Sabatini, Andrea & O'Toole, Thomas, 2024. "Technological co-development competence: A longitudinal case of a software development spinout," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    17. Zabara, Tatiana, 2019. "Evolution of entrepreneurial teams in technology-based new ventures," Other publications TiSEM cc09d065-3811-47b6-9c93-8, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    18. Gomes, Leonardo Augusto de Vasconcelos & dos Santos, Matheus Graciani & Facin, Ana Lúcia Figueiredo, 2022. "Uncertainty management in global innovation ecosystems," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    19. Mark D. Packard & Farsan Madjdi, 2026. "Seeing Expectations as “Opportunities†: Interpretive Philosophy and the Origins of “Opportunity†Perceptions," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 50(3), pages 830-861, May.
    20. Nguyen, Bach & Tran, Hai-Anh & Stephan, Ute & Van, Ha Nguyen & Anh, Pham Thi Hoang, 2024. "“I can't get it out of my mind” - Why, how, and when crisis rumination leads entrepreneurs to act and pivot during crises," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 39(4).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:techno:v:151:y:2026:i:c:s0166497225002962. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/01664972 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.