IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/techno/v146y2025ics0166497225001117.html

Bridging AI innovation and sustainable Development: The effect of AI technological progress on SDG investment performance

Author

Listed:
  • Platania, Federico
  • Toscano Hernandez, Celina
  • El Ouadghiri, Imane
  • Peillex, Jonathan

Abstract

In the age of AI-driven innovation, Artificial Intelligence (AI) has become a transformative force in financial markets, reshaping investment strategies and sustainability-driven asset allocation. This study examines the impact of AI-driven innovation on the financial performance of sustainability-focused investments by analyzing the relationship between AI patent activity and the market returns of exchange-traded funds (ETFs) aligned with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Employing a state-space framework and a Kalman Filter model, we capture the dynamic influence of AI advancements on SDG-aligned ETFs, revealing that technological progress significantly enhances excess returns, particularly in the clean energy and water resource sectors. However, our analysis also uncovers sectoral variations in AI's financial impact, indicating that the benefits of AI innovation are unevenly distributed across industries. These findings bridge the gap between sustainable finance and technological innovation, demonstrating that AI serves as both a financial accelerator and a sustainability enabler. By integrating AI-driven innovation into asset pricing models, this study provides actionable insights for investors, policymakers, and corporate strategists, emphasizing the need to incorporate AI-based metrics into investment decision-making, risk assessment frameworks, and regulatory policies to foster sustainable economic growth.

Suggested Citation

  • Platania, Federico & Toscano Hernandez, Celina & El Ouadghiri, Imane & Peillex, Jonathan, 2025. "Bridging AI innovation and sustainable Development: The effect of AI technological progress on SDG investment performance," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:techno:v:146:y:2025:i:c:s0166497225001117
    DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2025.103279
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166497225001117
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.technovation.2025.103279?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nishant, Rohit & Kennedy, Mike & Corbett, Jacqueline, 2020. "Artificial intelligence for sustainability: Challenges, opportunities, and a research agenda," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    2. Bronwyn H. Hall & Adam Jaffe & Manuel Trajtenberg, 2005. "Market Value and Patent Citations," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 36(1), pages 16-38, Spring.
    3. Tehrani, Ali N. & Ray, Subhasis & Roy, Sanjit K. & Gruner, Richard L. & Appio, Francesco P., 2024. "Decoding AI readiness: An in-depth analysis of key dimensions in multinational corporations," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    4. Jon Truby, 2020. "Governing Artificial Intelligence to benefit the UN Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(4), pages 946-959, July.
    5. Lauren Cohen & Karl Diether & Christopher Malloy, 2013. "Misvaluing Innovation," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 26(3), pages 635-666.
    6. Iain M. Cockburn & Rebecca Henderson & Scott Stern, 2018. "The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Innovation: An Exploratory Analysis," NBER Chapters, in: The Economics of Artificial Intelligence: An Agenda, pages 115-146, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    7. Gu, Lifeng, 2016. "Product market competition, R&D investment, and stock returns," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(2), pages 441-455.
    8. Hirshleifer, David & Hsu, Po-Hsuan & Li, Dongmei, 2013. "Innovative efficiency and stock returns," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(3), pages 632-654.
    9. Ricardo Vinuesa & Hossein Azizpour & Iolanda Leite & Madeline Balaam & Virginia Dignum & Sami Domisch & Anna Felländer & Simone Daniela Langhans & Max Tegmark & Francesco Fuso Nerini, 2020. "The role of artificial intelligence in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-10, December.
    10. Sergio Alonso & Rosana Montes & Daniel Molina & Iván Palomares & Eugenio Martínez-Cámara & Manuel Chiachio & Juan Chiachio & Francisco J. Melero & Pablo García-Moral & Bárbara Fernández & Cristina Mor, 2021. "Ordering Artificial Intelligence Based Recommendations to Tackle the SDGs with a Decision-Making Model Based on Surveys," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-27, May.
    11. Gaies, Brahim, 2024. "In search of lost social finance: How do financial instability and inequality interact?," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 72(PA).
    12. Fama, Eugene F. & French, Kenneth R., 1993. "Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 3-56, February.
    13. Iain M. Cockburn & Rebecca Henderson & Scott Stern, 2018. "The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Innovation," NBER Working Papers 24449, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    14. Brahim Gaies, 2024. "Exploring the time-varying predictability of global financial instability over the last two decades: the influence of climate change news," Journal of Economic Studies, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 52(5), pages 904-918, August.
    15. Alexander V. Giczy & Nicholas A. Pairolero & Andrew A. Toole, 2022. "Identifying artificial intelligence (AI) invention: a novel AI patent dataset," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 476-505, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tseng, Kevin, 2022. "Learning from the Joneses: Technology spillover, innovation externality, and stock returns," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(2).
    2. Bereskin, Fred & Hsu, Po-Hsuan & Latham, William & Wang, Huijun, 2023. "So Sue Me! The cross section of stock returns related to patent infringement allegations," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    3. Po-Hsuan Hsu & Dongmei Li & Qin Li & Siew Hong Teoh & Kevin Tseng, 2022. "Valuation of New Trademarks," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(1), pages 257-279, January.
    4. Giau Bui, Dien & Chen, Yehning & Lin, Chih-Yung & Lin, Tse-Chun, 2021. "Risk-taking of bank CEOs and corporate innovation," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    5. Xiangshang Cai & Amedeo De Cesari & Ning Gao & Ni Peng, 2024. "Acquisitions and Technology Value Revision," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 70(7), pages 4283-4305, July.
    6. Chen, Sheng-Syan & Chen, Yan-Shing & Liang, Woan-lih & Wang, Yanzhi, 2020. "Public R&D spending and cross-sectional stock returns," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(1).
    7. Chan, Konan & Lin, Yueh-Hsiang & Wang, Yanzhi, 2017. "Limits-to-arbitrage, investment frictions, and innovation anomalies," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 1-14.
    8. Kong, Dongmin & Yang, Yiwei & Wang, Qin, 2023. "Innovative efficiency and firm value: Evidence from China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    9. Bostan, Ibrahim & Mian, G. Mujtaba, 2024. "Inventor CEOs and financing of innovation: Evidence from IPOs," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    10. Obrimah, Oghenovo A., 2024. "Measuring Innovativeness: A ranking of the ordinal utility from consumption is more robust than either of ‘outcomes of commercialization’ or patent counts," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 603-616.
    11. Leung, Woon Sau & Evans, Kevin P. & Mazouz, Khelifa, 2020. "The R&D anomaly: Risk or mispricing?," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    12. Zhou, Zixun & Zhou, Xinyu & Zhang, Xuezhi & He, Qi, 2025. "Not all sparks ignite the same flame: Firm AI innovation and ESG performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    13. Qiang Wang & Fuyu Zhang & Rongrong Li, 2025. "Artificial intelligence and sustainable development during urbanization: Perspectives on AI R&D innovation, AI infrastructure, and AI market advantage," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(1), pages 1136-1156, February.
    14. Zhao, Zuoxiang & Zhao, Qiuyun & Li, Siqi & Yan, Jiajia, 2025. "Artificial Intelligence-driven regional energy transition:Evidence from China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 48-60.
    15. Po-Hsuan Hsu & Hsiao-Hui Lee & Tong Zhou, 2022. "Patent Thickets, Stock Returns, and Conditional CAPM," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(11), pages 8343-8367, November.
    16. Tekic, Zeljko & Tekic, Anja, 2024. "Complex patterns of ICTs' effect on sustainable development at the national level: The triple bottom line perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    17. Alldredge, Dallin M. & Caglayan, Mustafa O. & Celiker, Umut, 2022. "How do investors trade R&D-intensive Stocks? Evidence from hedge funds and other institutional investors," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    18. Manuel Ammann & Philipp Horsch & David Oesch, 2016. "Competing with Superstars," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(10), pages 2842-2858, October.
    19. Yin, Libo & Xin, Yu, 2024. "China's cognitive bias premium: An exploration of innovation information," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 96(PA).
    20. Archibugi, Daniele & Mariella, Vitantonio & Vezzani, Antonio, 2025. "What next? Nations in the technological race through the 2030," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:techno:v:146:y:2025:i:c:s0166497225001117. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/01664972 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.