IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/techno/v146y2025ics0166497225000987.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

AI narratives model: Social perception of artificial intelligence

Author

Listed:
  • Denia, Elena

Abstract

Narratives surrounding Artificial Intelligence (AI) shape its societal reception, technological development, and regulatory framing. This article proposes a theoretical model to interpret these narratives, especially in the context of growing public engagement with generative AI technologies. The model is structured along three key coordinates: apocalypse, assistance and transcendence. Transitions between them are understood through two dominant narrative frames: the Pandora's Box frame (associated with loss of control), and the Social Progress frame (associated with the improvement of human life), each tending toward dystopian and utopian extremes, respectively. Based on this model, two questions are addressed: What types of AI stories predominate in popular culture? And do audiences actually align with them? To answer these, two empirical analyses are conducted. First, a review of the 300 highest-grossing science fiction films in North America reveals a rich variety of narratives across the entire spectrum, rather than clustering around opposing extremes. Second, focus group discussions with categorized audiences of varying levels of familiarity with AI technology show that they align progressively along the narrative spectrum: the general public tends toward apocalyptic framings, the interested public (in science and technology) focuses on assistance narratives, and the engaged public embraces improvement scenarios. This sequential distribution suggests a strong correlation between AI proximity and narrative positioning, with greater engagement associated with more positive —yet nuanced— views of AI. The model opens multiple avenues for future research, including the use of wider data sources, cross-cultural comparisons, longitudinal studies, tracking of narrative shifts, and focused analyses of more complex representations.

Suggested Citation

  • Denia, Elena, 2025. "AI narratives model: Social perception of artificial intelligence," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:techno:v:146:y:2025:i:c:s0166497225000987
    DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2025.103266
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166497225000987
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.technovation.2025.103266?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:techno:v:146:y:2025:i:c:s0166497225000987. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/01664972 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.