On the linear combination of the Gaussian and student’s t random field and the integral geometry of its excursion sets
In this paper, a random field, denoted by GTβν, is defined from the linear combination of two independent random fields, one is a Gaussian random field and the second is a student’s t random field with ν degrees of freedom scaled by β. The goal is to give the analytical expressions of the expected Euler–Poincaré characteristic of the GTβν excursion sets on a compact subset S of R2. The motivation comes from the need to model the topography of 3D rough surfaces represented by a 3D map of correlated and randomly distributed heights with respect to a GTβν random field. The analytical and empirical Euler–Poincaré characteristics are compared in order to test the GTβν model on the real surface.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 83 (2013)
Issue (Month): 2 ()
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622892/description#description|
|Order Information:|| Postal: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/supportfaq.cws_home/regional|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:83:y:2013:i:2:p:559-567. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Shamier, Wendy)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.