IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Testing the no-treatment effect based on a possibly misspecified accelerated failure time model

Listed author(s):
  • Hattori, Satoshi
Registered author(s):

    The accelerated failure time model is a useful alternative to the Cox proportional hazard model. We investigate whether or not a misspecified accelerated failure time model provides a valid test of the no-treatment effect in randomized clinical trials. We show that the minimum dispersion statistic based on rank regression by Wei et al. (1990) must be modified in order to conduct valid tests under misspecification, whereas the resampling-based methods by Jin et al. (2003) are valid without any modification. Numerical studies are conducted to examine the small sample behavior of the modified minimum dispersion statistic and the resampling-based method. Finally, an illustration is given with a dataset from a clinical trial.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by Elsevier in its journal Statistics & Probability Letters.

    Volume (Year): 82 (2012)
    Issue (Month): 2 ()
    Pages: 371-377

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:82:y:2012:i:2:p:371-377
    DOI: 10.1016/j.spl.2011.10.016
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    Order Information: Postal:

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    in new window

    1. A. G. DiRienzo & S. W. Lagakos, 2001. "Effects of model misspecification on tests of no randomized treatment effect arising from Cox's proportional hazards model," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 63(4), pages 745-757.
    2. Zhezhen Jin, 2003. "Rank-based inference for the accelerated failure time model," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 90(2), pages 341-353, June.
    3. Hattori, Satoshi, 2006. "Some properties of misspecified additive hazards models," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 76(15), pages 1641-1646, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:82:y:2012:i:2:p:371-377. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dana Niculescu)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.