IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/stapro/v80y2010i15-16p1253-1259.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hybrid bootstrap for mapping quantitative trait loci

Author

Listed:
  • Sun, Hokeun
  • Keener, Robert W.
  • Kim, Dong-Yun

Abstract

The hybrid bootstrap uses resampling ideas to extend the duality approach to interval estimation for a parameter of interest when there are nuisance parameters. The confidence region constructed by the hybrid bootstrap may perform much better than the parametric bootstrap region in situations where the data provide substantial information about the nuisance parameter, but limited information about the parameter of interest. We apply this method to estimate the location of quantitative trait loci (QTL) in interval mapping model. The conditional distribution of quantitative traits, given flanked genetic marker genotypes is often assumed to be the mixture model of two phenotype distributions. The mixing proportions in the model represent the recombination rate between a genetic marker and quantitative trait loci and provides information about the unknown location of the QTL. Since recombination events are unlikely, we will have less information about the location of the QTL than other parameters. This observation makes a hybrid approach to interval estimation for QTL appealing, especially since the necessary distribution theory, which is often a challenge for mixture models, can be handled by bootstrap simulation.

Suggested Citation

  • Sun, Hokeun & Keener, Robert W. & Kim, Dong-Yun, 2010. "Hybrid bootstrap for mapping quantitative trait loci," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 80(15-16), pages 1253-1259, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:80:y:2010:i:15-16:p:1253-1259
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167-7152(10)00110-0
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:80:y:2010:i:15-16:p:1253-1259. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622892/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.