IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/stapro/v80y2010i13-14p1121-1127.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Diffusion approximation of birth-death processes: Comparison in terms of large deviations and exit points

Author

Listed:
  • Pakdaman, Khashayar
  • Thieullen, Michèle
  • Wainrib, Gilles

Abstract

We compare the large deviations between jump Markov processes and their diffusion approximations for the problem of escape from a domain. It is known that the escape times are generally asymptotically different, leading to a quantitative error. In this paper we show that the escape point can also be different, which implies a qualitative error. In dimension one, for a general class of birth-and-death processes, we show that there always exists a domain [a,b] such that the jump process asymptotically escapes from a and its approximation from b.

Suggested Citation

  • Pakdaman, Khashayar & Thieullen, Michèle & Wainrib, Gilles, 2010. "Diffusion approximation of birth-death processes: Comparison in terms of large deviations and exit points," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 80(13-14), pages 1121-1127, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:80:y:2010:i:13-14:p:1121-1127
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167-7152(10)00076-3
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Giuseppe D’Onofrio & Claudio Macci & Enrica Pirozzi, 2018. "Asymptotic Results for First-Passage Times of Some Exponential Processes," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 1453-1476, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:80:y:2010:i:13-14:p:1121-1127. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622892/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.