IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/stapro/v79y2009i2p138-144.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Approximation of the expected error rate in classification of the Gaussian random field observations

Author

Listed:
  • Ducinskas, Ke[combining cedilla]stutis

Abstract

The problem of classification of Gaussian random field observations into one of two populations specified by different regression mean models and common stationary covariance function is considered. The observations to be classified are assumed to be dependent on training sample. This is a more realistic assumption than the assumption of independence exploited in the previous papers. Unknown means parameters and common variance as a scale parameter are estimated from training sample. These estimators are plugged in the Bayes discriminant function. The approximation of the expected error rate associated with plug-in Bayes discriminant function is derived. This is the generalization of the known approximation. Numerical analysis of the accuracy of the proposed approximation in the small training sample case with locally optimal design is carried out.

Suggested Citation

  • Ducinskas, Ke[combining cedilla]stutis, 2009. "Approximation of the expected error rate in classification of the Gaussian random field observations," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 79(2), pages 138-144, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:79:y:2009:i:2:p:138-144
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167-7152(08)00357-X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jūratė Šaltytė‐Benth & Kȩstutis Dučinskas, 2005. "Linear Discriminant Analysis of Multivariate Spatial–Temporal Regressions," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 32(2), pages 281-294, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:79:y:2009:i:2:p:138-144. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622892/description#description .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.