IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/stapro/v79y2009i17p1878-1883.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The "north pole problem" and random orthogonal matrices

Author

Listed:
  • Eaton, Morris L.
  • Muirhead, Robb J.

Abstract

This paper is motivated by the following observation. Take a 3x3 random (Haar distributed) orthogonal matrix [Gamma], and use it to "rotate" the north pole, x0 say, on the unit sphere in R3. This then gives a point u=[Gamma]x0 that is uniformly distributed on the unit sphere. Now use the same orthogonal matrix to transform u, giving v=[Gamma]u=[Gamma]2x0. Simulations reported in Marzetta et al. [Marzetta, T.L., Hassibi, B., Hochwald, B.M., 2002. Structured unitary space-time autocoding constellations. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 48 (4) 942-950] suggest that v is more likely to be in the northern hemisphere than in the southern hemisphere, and, moreover, that w=[Gamma]3x0 has higher probability of being closer to the poles ±x0 than the uniformly distributed point u. In this paper we prove these results, in the general setting of dimension p>=3, by deriving the exact distributions of the relevant components of u and v. The essential questions answered are the following. Let x be any fixed point on the unit sphere in Rp, where p>=3. What are the distributions of U2=x'[Gamma]2x and U3=x'[Gamma]3x? It is clear by orthogonal invariance that these distributions do not depend on x, so that we can, without loss of generality, take x to be x0=(1,0,...,0)'[set membership, variant]Rp. Call this the "north pole". Then is the first component of the vector [Gamma]kx0. We derive stochastic representations for the exact distributions of U2 and U3 in terms of random variables with known distributions.

Suggested Citation

  • Eaton, Morris L. & Muirhead, Robb J., 2009. "The "north pole problem" and random orthogonal matrices," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 79(17), pages 1878-1883, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:79:y:2009:i:17:p:1878-1883
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167-7152(09)00195-3
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:79:y:2009:i:17:p:1878-1883. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622892/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.