IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/stapro/v78y2008i3p207-213.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An explicit representation of the limit of the LRT for interval mapping of quantitative trait loci

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Hong
  • Chen, Hanfeng
  • Li, Zhaohai

Abstract

Consider the interval mapping method for quantitative trait loci (QTL) detection of an experimental organism in a backcross population. In a recent paper, Chen and Chen [2005. On some statistical aspects of the interval mapping for QTL detection. Statist. Sinica 15, 909-925] show that the limiting null distribution of the likelihood ratio test (LRT) statistic for testing existence of a QTL flanked by two markers is that of the supremum of a [chi]2-process. In this note, an explicit representation of the supremum in terms of the recombination fraction between two markers of the [chi]2-process is presented. Based on the explicit representation, a simulation algorithm for determining a limiting threshold of the LRT is given.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Hong & Chen, Hanfeng & Li, Zhaohai, 2008. "An explicit representation of the limit of the LRT for interval mapping of quantitative trait loci," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 78(3), pages 207-213, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:78:y:2008:i:3:p:207-213
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167-7152(07)00215-5
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Guanfu Liu & Pengfei Li & Yukun Liu & Xiaolong Pu, 2020. "Hypothesis testing for quantitative trait locus effects in both location and scale in genetic backcross studies," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 47(4), pages 1064-1089, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:78:y:2008:i:3:p:207-213. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622892/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.