Biases of the maximum likelihood and Cohen-Sackrowitz estimators for the tree-order model
Consider s+1 univariate normal populations with common variance [sigma]2 and means [mu]i, i=0,1,...,s, constrained by the tree-order restrictions [mu]i[greater-or-equal, slanted][mu]0, i=1,2,...,s. For certain sequences [mu]0,[mu]1,... the maximum likelihood-based estimator (MLBE) of [mu]0 diverges to -[infinity] as s-->[infinity] and its bias is unbounded. By contrast, the bias of an alternative estimator of [mu]0 proposed by Cohen and Sackrowitz (J. Statist. Plan. Infer. 107 (2002) 89-101) remains bounded. In this note the biases of the MLBEs of the other components [mu]1,[mu]2,... are studied and compared to the biases of the corresponding Cohen-Sackrowitz estimators (CSE). Unlike the MLBE of [mu]0, the MLBEs of [mu]i for i[greater-or-equal, slanted]1, are asymptotically unbiased in most cases. By contrast, the CSEs of [mu]i, i=1,2,...,s more often have nonzero asymptotic bias.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 71 (2005)
Issue (Month): 3 (March)
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622892/description#description|
|Order Information:|| Postal: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/supportfaq.cws_home/regional|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:71:y:2005:i:3:p:267-276. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dana Niculescu)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.