The Glivenko-Cantelli theorem based on data with randomly imputed missing values
Glivenko-Cantelli-type results will be derived for the performance of the empirical distribution function under imputation of the missing data in the univariate case, when there are no auxiliary covariates. According to these results, both random imputation and the adjusted random imputation produce reliable estimates of the unknown distribution function. They are reliable in the sense that the corresponding empirical distribution functions stay (w.p.1) "close" to F(t), uniformly over t. At the same time, it is also shown that if r(n)[less-than-or-equals, slant]n is the number of nonmissing observations, then one cannot improve on the performance of the empirical distribution function Fr(n) by generating artificial data, in order to increase the sample size from r(n) to n (using either one of the above two imputation procedures).
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 55 (2001)
Issue (Month): 4 (December)
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622892/description#description|
|Order Information:|| Postal: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/supportfaq.cws_home/regional|
References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Arenal-Gutiérrez, Eusebio & Matrán, Carlos & Cuesta-Albertos, Juan A., 1996. "Unconditional Glivenko-Cantelli-type theorems and weak laws of large numbers for bootstrap," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 365-375, March.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:55:y:2001:i:4:p:385-396. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Shamier, Wendy)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.