IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/stapro/v20y1994i3p173-182.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On ordinary least-squares methods for sample surveys

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Song-Gui
  • Chow, Shein-Chung
  • Tse, Siu-Keung

Abstract

The performance of the ordinary least-squares (LS) method for two-stage sampling in regression analysis is studied. It is shown that the best linear unbiased estimator (BLUE) can be approximated by a polynomial in intracluster correlation. In particular, the least-squares estimator (LSE) is a zero-order approximation to the BLUE. To provide some insights into the approximation of the BLUE by the LSE, an upper bound for the difference between LSE and the first-order approximation to the BLUE is derived. Furthermore, bounds for the difference between the covariance matrices of the LSE and the BLUE are derived. Similar idea is applied to compare the LS and the BLU predictors of population total under a superpopulation model. For example, when the design matrix is ill-conditioned and/or the condition number of the covariance matrix of the error vector is large, the LSE has a poor performance compared to the BLUE.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Song-Gui & Chow, Shein-Chung & Tse, Siu-Keung, 1994. "On ordinary least-squares methods for sample surveys," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 173-182, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:20:y:1994:i:3:p:173-182
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0167-7152(94)90039-6
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:20:y:1994:i:3:p:173-182. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622892/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.