IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/stapro/v171y2021ics016771522030328x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Deviation estimates for Eulerian edit numbers of random graphs

Author

Listed:
  • Ganesan, Ghurumuruhan

Abstract

Consider the random graph G(n,p) obtained by allowing each edge in the complete graph on n vertices to be present with probability p independent of the other edges. In this paper, we study the minimum number of edge edit operations needed to convert G(n,p) into an Eulerian graph. We obtain deviation estimates for three types Eulerian edit numbers based on whether we perform only edge additions or only edge deletions or a combination of both and show that with high probability, roughly n4 operations suffice in all three cases.

Suggested Citation

  • Ganesan, Ghurumuruhan, 2021. "Deviation estimates for Eulerian edit numbers of random graphs," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:171:y:2021:i:c:s016771522030328x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.spl.2020.109025
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016771522030328X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.spl.2020.109025?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ghurumuruhan Ganesan, 2018. "Phase Transition in Inhomogenous Erdős-Rényi Random Graphs via Tree Counting," Sankhya A: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Springer;Indian Statistical Institute, vol. 80(1), pages 1-27, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:171:y:2021:i:c:s016771522030328x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622892/description#description .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.