IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/spapps/v200y2026ics0304414926001547.html

Risk-averse mean field games: Exploitability and non-asymptotic analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Cheng, Ziteng
  • Jaimungal, Sebastian

Abstract

In this paper, we use mean field games (MFGs) to investigate approximations of N-player games (NpGs) with uniformly symmetrically continuous heterogeneous closed-loop actions. To incorporate agents’ risk aversion (beyond the classical expected utility of total costs), we use an abstract evaluation functional for their performance criteria. Centered around the notion of exploitability, we conduct non-asymptotic analysis on the approximation capability of MFGs from the perspective of state-action distributions without requiring the uniqueness of equilibria. Under suitable assumptions, we first show that scenarios in the NpGs with large N and small average exploitabilities can be well approximated by approximate solutions of MFGs with relatively small exploitabilities. We then show that δ-mean field equilibria (MFEs) can be used to construct ε-equilibria in NpGs. Furthermore, in this general setting, we prove the existence of MFEs. This proof reveals a possible avenue for incorporating penalization for randomized action into MFGs.

Suggested Citation

  • Cheng, Ziteng & Jaimungal, Sebastian, 2026. "Risk-averse mean field games: Exploitability and non-asymptotic analysis," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:spapps:v:200:y:2026:i:c:s0304414926001547
    DOI: 10.1016/j.spa.2026.105022
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304414926001547
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.spa.2026.105022?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:spapps:v:200:y:2026:i:c:s0304414926001547. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/505572/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.