IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/spapps/v195y2026ics0304414926000050.html

The multi-level friendship paradox for sparse random graphs

Author

Listed:
  • Subhra Hazra, Rajat
  • den Hollander, Frank
  • Parvaneh, Azadeh

Abstract

In [1] we analysed the friendship paradox for sparse random graphs. For four classes of random graphs we characterised the empirical distribution of the friendship biases between vertices and their neighbours at distance 1, proving convergence as n → ∞ to a limiting distribution, with n the number of vertices, and identifying moments and tail exponents of the limiting distribution. In the present paper we look at the multi-level friendship bias between vertices and their neighbours at distance k∈N obtained via a k-step exploration according to a backtracking or a non-backtracking random walk. We identify the limit of the empirical distribution of the multi-level friendship biases as n → ∞ and/or k → ∞. We show that for non-backtracking exploration the two limits commute for a large class of sparse random graphs, including those that locally converge to a rooted Galton-Watson tree. In particular, we show that the same limit arises when k depends on n, i.e., k=kn, provided limn→∞kn=∞ under some mild conditions. We exhibit cases where the two limits do not commute and show the relevance of the mixing time of the exploration.

Suggested Citation

  • Subhra Hazra, Rajat & den Hollander, Frank & Parvaneh, Azadeh, 2026. "The multi-level friendship paradox for sparse random graphs," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:spapps:v:195:y:2026:i:c:s0304414926000050
    DOI: 10.1016/j.spa.2026.104873
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304414926000050
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.spa.2026.104873?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:spapps:v:195:y:2026:i:c:s0304414926000050. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/505572/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.