IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/spapps/v168y2024ics0304414923002247.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The limit point in the Jante’s law process has an absolutely continuous distribution

Author

Listed:
  • Crane, Edward
  • Volkov, Stanislav

Abstract

We study a stochastic model of consensus formation, introduced in 2015 by Grinfeld, Volkov and Wade, who called it a multidimensional randomized Keynesian beauty contest. The model was generalized by Kennerberg and Volkov, who called their generalization the Jante’s law process. We consider a version of the model where the space of possible opinions is a convex body B in Rd. N individuals in a population each hold a (multidimensional) opinion in B. Repeatedly, the individual whose opinion is furthest from the centre of mass of the N current opinions chooses a new opinion, sampled uniformly at random from B. Kennerberg and Volkov showed that the set of opinions that are not furthest from the centre of mass converges to a random limit point. We show that the distribution of the limit opinion is absolutely continuous, thus proving the conjecture made after Proposition 3.2 in Grinfeld et al.

Suggested Citation

  • Crane, Edward & Volkov, Stanislav, 2024. "The limit point in the Jante’s law process has an absolutely continuous distribution," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:spapps:v:168:y:2024:i:c:s0304414923002247
    DOI: 10.1016/j.spa.2023.104252
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304414923002247
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.spa.2023.104252?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:spapps:v:168:y:2024:i:c:s0304414923002247. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/505572/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.