IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/spapps/v116y2006i8p1195-1214.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The proportional hazards regression model with staggered entries: A strong martingale approach

Author

Listed:
  • Burke, Murray D.
  • Feng, Dandong

Abstract

The proportional hazards regression model, when subjects enter the study in a staggered fashion, is studied. A strong martingale approach is used to model the two-time parameter counting processes. It is shown that well-known univariate results such as weak convergence and martingale inequalities can be extended to this two-dimensional model. Strong martingale theory is also used to prove weight convergence of a general weighted goodness-of-fit process and its weighted bootstrap counterpart.

Suggested Citation

  • Burke, Murray D. & Feng, Dandong, 2006. "The proportional hazards regression model with staggered entries: A strong martingale approach," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 116(8), pages 1195-1214, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:spapps:v:116:y:2006:i:8:p:1195-1214
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304-4149(06)00024-X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ivanoff, B. Gail, 1996. "Stopping times and tightness for multiparameter martingales," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 111-114, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Burke, Murray D., 2000. "Multivariate tests-of-fit and uniform confidence bands using a weighted bootstrap," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 13-20, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:spapps:v:116:y:2006:i:8:p:1195-1214. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/505572/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.