Author
Listed:
- Li, Li
- Huang, Xuanhao
- Li, Tiantian
- Tian, Erxia
Abstract
As the impact of increasingly complex upstream and downstream relationships on analyst forecasts continues to intensify, the effect of institutional investors' equity extension along the industry chain on analyst forecast bias has become a critical issue. This paper explores the influence of vertical institutional ownership (VIO) on analyst forecast bias within the industry chain. The findings indicate that VIO significantly reduces analyst forecast bias, demonstrating its positive role in optimizing the capital market information environment. Mechanism tests reveal that VIO enhances corporate information transparency, mitigates business risks, and alleviates supply and demand mismatches along the industry chain. These effects reduce the complexity and cost of analyst forecasts, thereby constraining forecast bias. Based on heterogeneity analysis, we find that the inhibitory effect of VIO on analyst forecast bias is more evident for companies with weaker profitability, higher business complexity, lower analyst competence, and those located in regions where the industry chain leader policy has not been implemented. Furthermore, an analysis of vertical institutional characteristics suggests that the inhibitory impact of VIO on analyst forecast bias is greater when institutional equity extends downstream along the industry chain, demonstrates greater resilience to stress, and involves ownership entry. These findings not only enrich the existing research related to institutional co-ownership and analyst forecast bias but also offer practical insights and policy recommendations for leveraging VIO's governance effects to enhance the capital market information environment.
Suggested Citation
Li, Li & Huang, Xuanhao & Li, Tiantian & Tian, Erxia, 2026.
"Vertical institutional ownership and analyst forecast bias: Evidence from industry chain equity linkages,"
Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:riibaf:v:88:y:2026:i:c:s0275531926001613
DOI: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2026.103434
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:riibaf:v:88:y:2026:i:c:s0275531926001613. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ribaf .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.