IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/riibaf/v82y2026ics0275531925004635.html

Unpacking banks’ response to societal expectations: An NLP analysis of European banks’ discussion of climate change

Author

Listed:
  • Löfgren, Åsa
  • Elliott, Jasmine
  • Yu, Yinan
  • Scheidegger, Samuel

Abstract

We employ Natural Language Processing (NLP) to analyze how climate change is discussed in the annual sustainability reports of the 35 largest EU banks (2015–2021), assessing alignment with four societal expectations: decarbonizing financial products and services, addressing climate-related risks, reducing operational emissions, and enhancing transparency. These expectations stem from governments, regulators, and civil society. Analyzing over 1.5 million statements, we find that about 7% of content pertains to climate change. Banks increasingly focus on decarbonizing consumer products and their own operations, but devote less attention to financed emissions, transition risks, and concrete commitments. Our study contributes to the application of NLP in climate finance by qualitatively interpreting how banks, in their own words, engage with societal expectations around the climate transition. This complements quantitative studies by contextualizing disclosure patterns and highlighting reporting gaps and under-emphasized but material issues, offering insights that can inform policymakers in designing disclosure requirements.

Suggested Citation

  • Löfgren, Åsa & Elliott, Jasmine & Yu, Yinan & Scheidegger, Samuel, 2026. "Unpacking banks’ response to societal expectations: An NLP analysis of European banks’ discussion of climate change," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:riibaf:v:82:y:2026:i:c:s0275531925004635
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2025.103207
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0275531925004635
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ribaf.2025.103207?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:riibaf:v:82:y:2026:i:c:s0275531925004635. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ribaf .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.